- Joined
- Jan 19, 1999
- Messages
- 248
I once started getting into coin collecting, picked up a coin collector magazine off the newsstand, and went through the show listings. I found one a few miles away. It was a Sunday one-day show at a Holiday Inn. I walked into the small meeting room to find two dealers set-up. That's all. The room might have held three. "We do this every Sunday," I was told by one of the dealers.
As I see the segmentation and specialization of knife shows I fear we are headed in that direction. I feel that is wrong for the simple reason is these small specialized shows do little if anything to drawn in new blood, but instead bleed what few pumping hearts we have out there.
To say we only need one Blade show a year is insanity. We need 12 Blade Shows. Not enough dealers and collectors to sustain that? Then it is our own fault as we have not encouraged enough people to join us. Let's go get them.
Think of the dollar expansion in this market if we could sustain that many Blade-size shows.
Asking Blade to restrict/police their ABS and Guild sections as an alternative to a combined ABS/Guild show is passing the buck and the responsibility for making this business grow to someone else.
Blade owns their own show and they can do what they darn well please about show table placement. And you WILL like it, because since we have ONLY one major combined show you have NO other option. Think about that before encouraging a single dominant show.
I started this thread to point out the absurdity of the parochial self-serving approach that seems to be the vogue in knives. In my gut I knew ahead of time that nothing would come of such a suggestion for a combined show, for reasons already stated.
It should not be a sacrilege to suggest that two knife organizations and their leadership sit down together and do something for the common good.
Leaders need to lead.
As I see the segmentation and specialization of knife shows I fear we are headed in that direction. I feel that is wrong for the simple reason is these small specialized shows do little if anything to drawn in new blood, but instead bleed what few pumping hearts we have out there.
To say we only need one Blade show a year is insanity. We need 12 Blade Shows. Not enough dealers and collectors to sustain that? Then it is our own fault as we have not encouraged enough people to join us. Let's go get them.
Think of the dollar expansion in this market if we could sustain that many Blade-size shows.
Asking Blade to restrict/police their ABS and Guild sections as an alternative to a combined ABS/Guild show is passing the buck and the responsibility for making this business grow to someone else.
Blade owns their own show and they can do what they darn well please about show table placement. And you WILL like it, because since we have ONLY one major combined show you have NO other option. Think about that before encouraging a single dominant show.
I started this thread to point out the absurdity of the parochial self-serving approach that seems to be the vogue in knives. In my gut I knew ahead of time that nothing would come of such a suggestion for a combined show, for reasons already stated.
It should not be a sacrilege to suggest that two knife organizations and their leadership sit down together and do something for the common good.
Leaders need to lead.