I would be very disappointed in the ABS if they allowed such a blade to qualify. The definition of forging has been discussed here recently and I was a little perplexed in how the obvious was overlooked, i.e. shouldn't "
forging" at some point involve a "
forge"??

With patience anybody could cold hammer a blade out of a piece of metal, being a skilled bladesmith is not about the hammer it is about very developed skills in control of the temperatures. If the ABS were to dismiss this they would have to disregard 3/4 of the art they have worked so hard to preserve. Maintaining a proper fire, control of atmosphere, decarb and scale while working within that range which moves the metal yet doesn't overheat are what it is about. Controlling grain size, distributing carbon, pattern welding, normalizing and learning colors etc... Eliminate these things and we could be interchangeable with tinsmiths, silversmiths or any number of metalworkers who shape cold metal.
On the other hand... properly cold worked steel would have its molecules packed incredibly tight and be many times more dense than the hot worked stuff. And the richer the alloy the harder it would be to move it, which would be a strong indication of how all of those carbides mashing together would be imparting unbelievable strength to the steel with virtually no chance of micro fracturing. I know Jarod suggested normal heat treating but why not think outside the box and leave the heat off it entirely? I would expect to get many 180 degree flexes out of it (which could be perhaps twice as many 90 degree bends

!!!). The edge holding would be from work hardening alone thus the blade would be unbreakable, yet very sharpenable!!!:thumbup: When one weighs the possible benefits it does indeed render not
just forging but any heat treating a moot point.
Once again it is a tough call- preserving a tradition or abandoning orthodox dogma in order to climb to new heights in blade performance.