Given your name, I'm going to assume you're either a doctor, or an attorney (or perhaps one of the rare creatures with dual degrees).
Either way, i would expect you to have better critical thinking skills than to rant like a slobbering teenager.
Stop playing Counterstrike for a moment and come take a stroll through the world of logic with me.
Your position is that if nobody rebuts CS, then CS wins. Alternatively, it could be phrased that in order for CS to lose, someone has to rebut them.
Frankly, the basis for your position is a load of horse pucky.
It's like saying that "The town nut job stands at the I95 overpass and waves his penis at traffic, but because people don't pull off the highway to tell him he's wrong, he's totally right to do so."
The fact that passers-by do not take the time to address the idiot, and instead laugh at him and go about their lives, should not be taken to give credence to his actions.
A rebuttal is not part and parcel of debunking/discrediting a position when that position is so preposterous on its face that it fails on its own.
You get what I'm saying?