The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
It looks like elmax may have won?
I wonder how you super quench those air hardening steel?
Actually, it's much easier to SQ high Cr steel than low Cr high carbon steels. For all steels the hardest part is ensuring a uniform dimensional changes in crystal phase. SS usually have lower dimensional changes between phases.
I have try quenching D2 with park50 before and its cracked... I would love to know how you quench those high Cr steel with brine without any problem.
SQ is 3 seconds quench, where brine is 5 seconds, p50 around 7 seconds. Refrain myself from OTing...
Super quench is to quench in high concentrate brine mix with surfactant isn't it?
I'm amaze at how tough plain 52100 is when heat treated right. I've seen 1095 chip up to and past the bevel from a nail. That looks like it would compete or surpass 3v
^^^^I calling you out on the edge retention of 52100!!
How much cardboard did you cut? (The rest of the material isn't going to dull 52100, and it's not going to chip it)
52100 does not excel at edge retention through cardboard, which when dirty enough is sand paper......
I am not saying that is has bad edge retention, but it's not going to hold up to cutting A LOT of cardboard.
Certainly not to where it will slice printer paper....
Depending on what you cut. Can't make absolute claims one way or the other without qualifications, it's much more nuanced than that. I've never seen this "quicker dulling" that you are referring to, but I might not be using it the same way either.[...]
Explains pretty well how toughness, wear resistance, etc come into play. High wear resistance is kind of useless unless you have some toughness to back it up. Otherwise in real use these "super steels" will dull much quicker due to fracturing at the edge.
[...]
Depending on what you cut. Can't make absolute claims one way or the other without qualifications, it's much more nuanced than that. I've never seen this "quicker dulling" that you are referring to, but I might not be using it the same way either.
True, but people start falling asleep when the real material science discussion starts, not that I'd be the one presenting the information. I don't know enough about it to and I really don't believe people here want to get into these arcane and fairly obscure facts. In my mind people want to see results. What will work for them and their uses. I believe there's a much better alternative for a lot of people that have been let down by some of these weaker steels or by makers that continuously push knives with poor cutting ability. I'm one of them, I know there are a lot more. There are definitely people who want the carbide loaded steels because that's what works for them in their experience. It's cool, we're all part of the knife world. There shouldn't be one camp attacking another, that's crazy. If you use and like highly loaded steels, that's awesome. They're tools meant to work. If a hammer works better for you and a screwdriver works better for me, there should be no argument from either of us. It is what it is. Some guys do dump on others when they need a screwdriver instead of a hammer and that doesn't make sense to me.
One thing I notice a bunch here is people lust after super thin edges for whatever reason. Some steels do it great and some, super or not don't. Someone thins out 1095 like they can 3V and it's the worst steel ever. You can have a thicker edge and still be razor shaving sharp that has an edge that lasts just as long on a 1095 blade as it does on 3V. It stems from people getting into knives well into adult life who have never had a need for a knife. Of course they go for what they see as the "best" and get 3V. They see a blade they like in 1095 and aren't happy with the thick useful edge and thin it out. They have no clue that's not how it works and use the blade outside it's designed parameters.
Don't care what anyone says, I've used 1095 too long. I can put an edge on any of mine that will rival super steel edge retention under hard use because I know exactly how that steel needs to be sharpened and I avoid super thin paper slicing edges, but they are still razor sharp and can still easily slice after hours of continuous use. I can sharpen AUS8 with a proper heat treat, not that SOG 54-56HRC stuff and 8cr13mov that will destroy a S30V blade in a cardboard cutting test. I've seen several thin S30V blades get eaten up by even 420HC because they were sharpened correctly.
You don't need super steel to get super performance. You just need to not be dumb enough to not thin them out to the point of being outside what the steel itself can handle.
That's just my observations, no laboratory or steel charts to back it up but it works out great in the real world.
To be fair I hope one day I can get a knife as thin as a razor blade that can still handle the tasks I demand of it.
You don't need super steel to get super performance.
It's important to note that a knife retains its cutting ability through one of two ways. Ankerson is a huge proponent of one method, getting massive amounts of carbides at the edge and letting the steel give way to the carbides and letting the carbides do the cutting. That's fine if you want aggressive edges but it doesn't make a really strong knife. The other way is to take a tough, fine grained steel and harden the shit out of it. The edge will resist fracture and deformation. Cliff Stamp is a huge proponent of this.