The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
I have to assume that you are using the words "carbon steel" to refer to the non-stainless varieties of steel. Frankly, the only advantage that a "stainless" steel has over a "non-stainless" is the level of care/maintenance.
Over the last decade or so, the choice that knife buyers make has leaned heavily towards the "flavor of the month", that meaning that more individuals purchase a knife based on the "cool factor" of the steel used, rather then how well it fuctions as a knife. I am reminded of the period of time when a material called Talonite was all the rage because it was different and the "mall ninja" crowd thought it was so cool. After that it was CPMS30V.....I actually produced a number of knives from that particular steel, and found it to be some of the most troublesome steel that I have ever used. It was very difficult to work, and to this day, many of those S30V blades come back to me on a regular basis, simply because the owners can't sharpen them.
Knifemaking, and knives in general is all about trade offs.... there is no "ideal" steel for a knife, that covers all the "wants" of everyone. Each individual must decide for themselves those characteristics they value most, and seek a steel that most closely provides those characteristics.
Time and experience has taught me that the major factors most knowledgable buyers/users value in a knife are edge retention, toughness, and EASE OF SHARPENING. In all of those catagories, the favor falls to "carbon steel". Speaking personally, there are only two reasons that I can see why a person would choose a stainless blade.... 1. Their primary concern is minimal maintenance. 2. Bragging rights about having a blade made of the "latest and greatest" steel.
Right, wrong, or indifferent, what I spoke about earlier.... The Cool Factor, is currently the biggest selling point for most knife buyers, particularly in the tactical arena. An example is... most of us have seen the "multi-grinds" that are all the rage these days (a single blade that is partially hollow ground, partially flat ground, etc.) From a using standpoint, these blade are next to useless, but they sell very well because they look "cool".
What I foresee is that the current trend towards more and more stainless steel will continue for a while....but as the masses of a new generation discover its short comings for a blade, the focus will shift towards carbon steels again. I've been at this long enough to have seen this cycle take place before.....the only thing that changes are the names of the stainless steels.
I agree with this post from another thread and thought it fits nicely in this thread.
Post written by Ed Caffery
Are you still pumped when your favorite knife has a Super Steel variant come out, or a new steel hits the market? Or do you find yourself slipping back to the old standbys of 154, VG10, A2, 1095, or possibly even Aus8 and 440?
What about laminated carbon steel? I have a santoku w/ a super blue core, and a stainless exterior.I could almost careless what steel my folders or fixed blades have.
For my work knives, as a chef, my steel has to be carbon.
Phill Hartsfield got me over the Super steels back in the 80's.
RIP, Phill.
rolf
Edge retention is not a carbon advantage... I did not find S30V that hard to re-sharpen with extra coarse diamond hones, at least not compared to 440C... 440C is still my first choice based on edge holding combined with extreme abuse in use, and not just the stain resistance. S30V would be equivalent or second, but is not as stain resistant, so really a second-rate steel, if it was not that it seeems like it has a much easier to restore satin finish quality when you sand it paralell the grind grain, a big plus compared to the seemingly harder to fix 440C satin finish... Aus-6/8 has the same quality of being easy to sand out the scratches from, if you sand paralell to the grind...
Aus-8 is a close equivalent to 440C, but Aus-6 seems to scratch much easier from chopping, even if it holds an edge very well: Scratches are a big disadvantage to me. Also 440C edge-holding seems to vary a lot from maker to maker. Randall's 440B really holds an edge.
Gaston
Edge retention is not a carbon advantage... I did not find S30V that hard to re-sharpen with extra coarse diamond hones, at least not compared to 440C... 440C is still my first choice based on edge holding combined with extreme abuse in use, and not just the stain resistance. S30V would be equivalent or second, but is not as stain resistant, so really a second-rate steel, if it was not that it seeems like it has a much easier to restore satin finish quality when you sand it paralell the grind grain, a big plus compared to the seemingly harder to fix 440C satin finish... Aus-6/8 has the same quality of being easy to sand out the scratches from, if you sand paralell to the grind...
Aus-8 is a close equivalent to 440C, but Aus-6 seems to scratch much easier from chopping, even if it holds an edge very well: Scratches are a big disadvantage to me. Also 440C edge-holding seems to vary a lot from maker to maker. Randall's 440B really holds an edge.
Gaston