Here is an interesting video regarding UK knife laws.
[youtube]M1lPngiYUqQ[/youtube]
That video pretty much sums it up. The law is specifically written so it it subjective, and means little thugs can carry 'lethal' knives (lethal stab wound is considered over 3" in depth, hence the blade length part.) around and get away with it. It does mean there is no deffinative answer if a policeman will like your excuse and will procede toa rrest you but it gives you a common sense defence while stripping the undesireables of their weapons.
While I can respect that it costs you more to own one that money doesn't go into the production/performance of the knife. It is still a $30 knife. If you want an $85 knife buy an $85 knife. I don't know what Fallkniven blades go for there but I'd image it is cheaper than we get them here. Maybe look at one of those instead.
I stated pretty plainly that in my opinion you abused a cheap knife and expected too much out of it and stated why. Not sure how that can be seen as patronizing. How should I have said?
I asked a question out of ignorance. I didn't make a statement that could be passed on. I spent a few seconds tacking on a question about it because you obviously know more than me about the subject.
Abused it? I bought the 110 for two reasons. First being it is supposed to be a super tough knife that thousands of trademen have relied on for many mnay years. Second reason is it's an iconic knife, and I very much wanted one for my collection and to use.
I don't want a Fallkniven. I have plenty of very strong knives already, and I didn't like not using my Buck, but when I did use it as a general purpose knife it wasn't suitable.
People saying I'm abusing anything gets annoying over time, it wasn't abused. I didn't throw it, or stab anyone. I poked some wood, split some rabbit bones and cut some sapplings in my garden. If my swiss army knife is still in one piece I would expect my Buck to be, and that's why I'm dissapointed. That and it was actually a gift from my mother.

