At What Point is a Knife OVERPRICED?

Status
Not open for further replies.
A knife is overpriced when I can afford it and still won't buy it.

Do I want a CR or Busse??? Sure when the price is right----meaning no more than $150.

I'm a gun nut at heart and think nothing of spending $2500 on an O/U shotgun and have several actually----and have quite a few guns in the $1000 range too.

But go into fits when a knife price gets over $125---and own quite a few $100 knives---cause in the end---its still just a knife and $100 knife quality suits me just fine.

Kind of like I was watching this show about Ferrari's(SP?) and they said most customers add $20000 worth of options--I'm sittin there thinkin jeeze my whole car didn't cost $20000----no its not a Ferrari but its gets me where I'm goin and will probably last a lot longer too.
 
i would break it down like this if you want a tool to cut things with, a opinel @12 bucks or so will do everything that i ask a folding knife to do,when it comes to handmade we are now entering into the relm of art,i put 30 to 50 hours into a folder useing skills that i have worked on for some 40 years. that 30 or 50 hours comes out of my freetime after work. if i asked 15 bucks a hour no one would buy them .a glock. fine pistol that it is has no soul. i put my heart and soul into every knife i make.
 
While I could talk about knives, but chose to avoid the subject on this thread, I cannot with a clear conscience abide talk about glocks when my Swenson 911 and Sig P220 who both have soul go unrecognized.

I ask what is the matter with you folks?
 
While I could talk about knives, but chose to avoid the subject on this thread, I cannot with a clear conscience abide talk about glocks when my Swenson 911 and Sig P220 who both have soul go unrecognized.

I ask what is the matter with you folks?
LOL.......Ed, some would say that the 220 is a stamped no soul pistol, but i would disagree. As for the Glock, Anton Glock had never designed a pistol before in his life. Not a bad little sucess story for a first timer, eh? And the pistol undoubtable does the job quite well. But so does a Toyota Prius and that little thing ain't gonna entice any supermodels to climb in:D
 
A knife is overpriced when I can afford it and still won't buy it.

Do I want a CR or Busse??? Sure when the price is right----meaning no more than $150.

I'm a gun nut at heart and think nothing of spending $2500 on an O/U shotgun and have several actually----and have quite a few guns in the $1000 range too.

But go into fits when a knife price gets over $125---and own quite a few $100 knives---cause in the end---its still just a knife and $100 knife quality suits me just fine.

Kind of like I was watching this show about Ferrari's(SP?) and they said most customers add $20000 worth of options--I'm sittin there thinkin jeeze my whole car didn't cost $20000----no its not a Ferrari but its gets me where I'm goin and will probably last a lot longer too.
The question is, if you were swimming in Bill Gates/Warren Buffett cash, would you spend the $75-100,000 for a Fabbri or Holland and Holland O/U?
 
While I could talk about knives, but chose to avoid the subject on this thread, I cannot with a clear conscience abide talk about glocks when my Swenson 911 and Sig P220 who both have soul go unrecognized.

I ask what is the matter with you folks?

Ed,

No need for you to talk about knives, your happy customers do it for you.
 
Probably not---if I had that kind scratch---my toys would be planes---boats and real estate-----lolol.
Yes, but you would need proper gear with which to shoot driven grouse once you arrived in your Gulfstream G550 :p
 
The price is too high when no one will buy it?

Manufacturers have to balance both supply and demand to project the profits. If the knife commands a price that is too high, they'll have to make do with the comparitively few who will buy it at that price. By lowering the price, they'll increase the numbers they sell and boost the profit margin. But they must be careful not to sell it too low.

Years ago in the gun world, Bill Ruger produced the Security-Six, one of the best .357 magnums ever, and at an extremely low price. But years later he admitted that he "didn't make a dime off the Security-Six." Even today, with the gun long discontinued, premium used Rugers bring substantially less than competing S&W revolvers that are inferior in design. This is good for buyers and bad for sellers. On the other hand, Colt made their famed Python .357 and sold it at a premium price. Granted, they could have sold more had their prices been lower, but then they were selling every Python they made, so why lower the price? Was it a better revolver? Many thought so, but it was fussy and had to be retimed frequently. And it had a grip that only an ape could love. Still, today, it continues to sell for a premium price. But people will still buy it.

The same principle applies also to knives. In another post I noted a knife made by Spyderco was selling for what I think is an unreasonably high price. Why? Because AUS6 stainless is still AUS6, and just because Spyderco stamps its name into the thing doesn't make it worth the inflated price. But I'm sure Spyderco would disagree and cite their sales to prove it.

So really, bottom line, is that a price is too high when YOU won't buy it! In other words, it's a subjective thing. What's too high for some won't be too high for others.

BTW, have you seen any Deloreans lately? : )
 
Reading earlier parts of this thread prompts me to say that we should stick with the facts and data, people don’t matter when interpreting information for conversations such as this, only the data matters. Not only will this allow you to stay objective, it will avoid misusing another human being. Misinterpreting data to others only leads to factual errors, misinterpreting people to others leads to putting words in their mouths and abusing a good name that is not yours.

Anybody is free to use my data all they want, I encourage that, I also encourage the other side to offer opposing data to give validity to my work by offering perspective. I do not encourage using smiths as unwilling subjects in human cock fights. The craft of bladesmithing is a remnant of a bygone era and as such is rife with beliefs that are literally medieval and outdated but still being kept alive by societal concepts and folklore. We have had the ability and technology to examine and understand these things for well over a century but traditional means have kept us from doing it, my intentions are to provide some long overdue insight in these areas with simple verifiable facts. I have no personal vendettas, and can think of no one person in the custom knife field that I have a personal dislike for, yet more than once I have had to calm and assure one of my colleagues that I had not personally attacked them when my name and theirs got used as weapons by opposing sides in a heated conflict over knives. Over knives! People, they are just knives! Flattened bits of steel with edges on them, I make my sole living off from them yet I am able to say that they are just knives! … But the people who make them are human beings.

I have never opposed Ed Fowler, he is a fellow smith and a human being, and a rather nice one at that. Many of my conclusions and data gathered from my experience are very different from his, but that is data, data does not pick sides, it does not bear ill will or resentment, in neither respects or disrespects- it just is, I find much comfort in that. If two people are given a riddle to solve but come up with entirely different answers how does that immediately mandate that they must be odds with each other on a more personal level? Virtually 98% of all the differences in findings I have encountered among smiths is solely a matter of how we interpret the results. One person sees the sun rising on the horizon, the other sees the planets rotation bringing its class G star into view, others can interpret which finding is correct but I think both observers can enjoy watching the sunrise together without any hurt feelings.

In summary I would like to apologize to Ed for allowing my name to be slammed against his in any personal fashion. Kevin Cashen the person is entirely irrelevant to the data and can lend no power to the data if is not strong enough to stand on its own! Feel free to draw conclusions from it, and put my data to the test, but our business has gotten into a sad state by allowing who says something to become more important that what they say. Ed and anybody else out there can count on my holding my conclusions up beside theirs for folks to make their own conclusions, but Ed and others can also rest assured that I make no such actions in regard to the person, I can only work with available information, and all my data on Ed Fowler the person tells me he is a good guy.


P.S. Since this thread was supposed to be about knife prices:confused: I would also like to add that although our knives are very different, inside and out, I have never made any bones about the fact that I believe Ed's knives to be a good investment for the collector and I would be happy to aquire one myself, if I found a good deal (I am, after all, living on knifemaker wages:()
 
Kevin:
I agree that some folks just like to pit us against each other then sit back and watch the fur fly. A few are relentless and one -- well .

I believe that if the two of us ever get the chance to spend a few weeks in a shop and laboratory we would find our goals in the same traces. Rex would have to interpertate between us because and it would be good times.

Debate over issues is always a good thing, both learn if they are willing and can keep an open mind.

Kevin, I apologize to you for letting folks set us up for a hassel.

It is kind of like these canibals who just appologized to some Methodists for eating their missionairies in the late 1800's. "We hope that now you can experience the joy of forgiveness".

Back to knives!
 
Well done gentlemen. Some of us already knew that what was posted was in error regarding this situation. I just hope the person will learn that putting words in makers mouths based on the makers experience and findings is by no means a logical conclusion and for many of us those types of conclusions are by no means "facts" but rants that indicate ignorance or an uneducated agenda.

As Kevin and Ed have put it ... Back to knives.
 
Pricing and value is something I happen to know a bit about... I am an appraiser by trade. While Real estate is the particular investment I spend my time evaluating, the principals of valuation are quite the same regardless of what is being examined.

Insofar as pricing is concerned, there are three methods of determining what something is worth, what it's value is. Weather or not whoever possesses the item asks for its actual value when offering for sale is another matter.

Principal 1: a knife is overpriced when the price exceeds the value.

This may seem like a no brainer, but consider what is really said. Value is an abstract, a concept. That concept is most typically tied in some abstract way to a statistically likely price, given a certain set of conditions.

Thus, one could define value as the most probable price an item would sell for if it were allowed adequate exposure to compete on the open market against other items of its like.
You will note in the very barebones definition of value above that adequate exposure and competition are key elements. Certainly, with a captive audience or a monopoly on an essential, value and price are irrelevent, as there is a bottleneck at supply, and any demand whatsoever must pay the price required. However, in the world of supply and demand, a certain level of exposure and a certain amount of time are required before an item can be expected to sell.

Principal 2: Value is an abstract that depends on conditions of exposure, supply, and effective demand.

Effective demand, BTW, is that segment of the population with both the desire to purchase an item, and the means to make that purchase a reality.

Thus, as price increases, effective demand decreases. In order to compensate for this, a greater degree of exposure, either through more advertising, or through longer marketing times, must be utilized.

And so, a crossection of sales could be sampled, where some knife sellers wanted top dollar for their product and either spent a fortune on advertising, or let their product be for sale for a very long time. Others wanted to sell a lot of knives quickly, and so their prices were low enough that neither advertising nor extended marketing times were needed. Both could very well be selling the same knives!

However, the majority of sales would be somewhere in the middle. Statistically, you're looking at a classic bell curve. In reality, we rarely get to see a statistically significant amount of data, and so we must make certain reasonable judgements about wat exactly lies in the midrange.

And thus, value is, by those who know what they are peaking about, quite often expressed as a range "between x and y dollars". or as a limit, "not more than x" or perhapse "not more than y".

One can tell if an item is overpriced not by weather or not it ever sells, but by weather or not it is taking too long for it to sell.

For example, let's say you're looking at a reseller who carries some work by custom smiths. You see a beautiful knife made by your favorite mastersmith. However, being a shrewd collector, you don't want to pay more than it's worth. Knowing the smith, the reseller, and the general conditions of the market would do you a great deal of good.

In the above example, let's say that the smith has a waiting list measured in years. Like most mastersmiths with that situation, he makes the occaisonal peice not based on commission, but because an idea struck his fancy, or whatnot.

However, even such conjecture peices tend to sell before they're finished.

The reseller in this example consistantly charges 10% more than the smith originally sold the knife for. They can get away with this because supply for this particular smith's work is short as compared to demand. However, this smith already charges a heafty premium for his goods, so buying from the reseller is getting very expensive. Many byers consider looking elsewhere, helping reduce demand a bit.

Thus, the reseller typically has something from this smoith for around two months before it sells. Sometimes a sale happens in less than a month, sometimes it takes three, but most typically, around two months.

In this situation, it would be quite obvious that the reseller is asking too darned much, if they have had a given knife for longer than say, four months. The price has exceeded the value by enough to require an extended marketing time.



Certainly, it is possible to speak to cost of manufacture. This is more of a factor in the mass produced market than it is in custom smithing. However, it bears mentioning.

In this instance, a knife is worth what it costs to produce it. Quite a useful approach (called, creatively enough, the cost approach) for wholesalers, factories, and such, but less so for us end level consumers. Still, the price and more importantly, the supply (which has a pretty large impact on price) are controlled by supply chains that begin and end with economists measuring cost per unit vs distribution vs absorption (how many units will sell in a give period of time). These economists are very, very good at what they do, and they, more than most people would believe are the rest of the body behind the so-called "invisible hand".
 
To boil the above down:

A knife is overpriced when it takes noticeably longer to sell than others like it, or when lots of advertising won't get it to sell more quickly than others like it.

If there are no others like it, it is overpriced when the person trying to sell is willing to sell for less than they are asking with no incentive to do so beyond getting it sold.
 
I won't be getting into income approach at all here. That sort of evaluation is beyond the scope of the original question.
 
Bravo, Ed and Kevin, very classy responses. Leave the poo slinging to those that enjoy criticizing your efforts while contributing very little if anything all themselves. You guys showed character that I believe is just as important as your experience and knowledge in making you well respected makers in the community. :thumbup:

PS Good posts, Dan.
 
I like Dan's explanations for their depth, but MikeH's is to the point and just as accurate.

For my personal enjoyment, a knife is overpriced when I expect it to be "all that and a bag of chips" relative to the money shelled out and either the chips are missing or they're a flavor I don't like (such as clam chips). I've had $440 knives be worth it and $255 knives leave me feeling sourly disappointed (and $50-100 knives having me do all sorts of happy dances for that matter).
 
Interesting that the person who tried the ploy with Ed and Kevin does not respond.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top