I just want to ask a question to those of you who are a little more business savvy.
Mike keeps saying that the reason he didn't give the knives to SS is because he didn't feel that SS would be competent to sell them.
From my point of view I dont see why this matters, if SS paid for the knives shouldn't he have the right to do whatever he wants with them. He owns them since he paid for them.
Its like me paying builders to build me a house and several months later when I expected the house to be done they tell me they don't think Ill take care of the house so they are going to build it for someone else and when its completed and sold I'll get my money back.
Im also a little taken back by the response of the members on the other forum, every time SS posts a comment stating facts all he gets back is -
"Boring"
"Please turn out the lights and lock the door when you leave"
"Yatta,Yatta,Yatta - g'night "
I also found this interesting from Mike -
"Steven,
I don't need Proof."
Well, it's his house, and over there he makes the rules. Notice he hasnt come over here to defend his position. And, he even makes a reference to this thread in one of his comments, so we all know he is aware of it. The fact is, he doesnt have a case to present. He jacked this guy for his money, and if the guy ever -does- get paid back it'll be when a court orders it, or when Mike feels like it.