Ed: I agree there is no value in building a knife for judging that compromises your personal philosophy. From my experience, I don't think I could win an award with a knife like this, because my heart would not be in it, and it would show in the final product. And, if the knife won, I would end up with the horror of having to build knives I didn't like!
But in the Tactical Knife category, I have found that there has been no need to do this. Two knives I entered were "stock" models, that I had built for years, and no modifications were made to the knife entered for judging.
And this year, I was fortunate enough to benefit from the real-world experiences of the judges, who stood there with the final two knives and asked each other "Which knife would you rather ruck around on a 25 mile hike?". They chose the lighter knife.
Over 30 years ago, I handed one of my first knives to a great friend and mentor. He was a great outdoorsman, the best I have ever known. He looked at the knife and said "It's nice, but I wouldn't walk across a frozen pond with it".
Meaning, it was too heavy! And I have never forgotten that lesson.