- Joined
- Apr 20, 2001
- Messages
- 18,423
This is why I own Glocks and keep a box full of springs and various replacement parts.
Well yeah, you have to with those plastic pistols.

The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
This is why I own Glocks and keep a box full of springs and various replacement parts.
Surplus ammo and C&R pistols and rifles of any quality have been stored in cosmoline or under ideal temp and humidity conditions.
Most commercial primers are not sealed. Modern primers, containing no hazmat like the mercury in the old style mercury fulminate primers of old begin to chemically deteriorate at the 30-40 year span, rendering them inconsistent or inert.
On an autopistol, both magazine springs and recoil springs are critical to timing to prevent feed jams and extraction failures. It is commonly recommended that one replace a recoil spring at 5000 rounds or sooner and magazine springs as required.
lol hey now, watch it, we don't want to start that argument, it will never end, besides we all know glock is the bestest pistol ever
I know, just yanking some chains among the Glock faithful!!!
![]()
I know it's funny when a few people have a short glock vs whoever fuse. I have been through a couple kimbers great pistols, but they have disappeared since I got married, they are on my mid life crisis list lol
Uh, I'm not talking about guns that have been stored and then brought out in like new condition, but those old wall hangers and beaters tha have been being used all along. There are plenty of those that are still rolling right along shooting.
I've shot ammo sitting around from 1903 up to 1960's and it shot just fine, with no more special storage than sitting on a shelf.
So, how would you know they have fired more than 5000 rounds in a scarce ammo situation?
Besides that 5000 rounds thing is a long debunked myth, from a US military practice of replacing 1911 recoil springs as a precaution. There have been tests and records kept that have had guns go tens of thousands of rounds on the original springs.
+1. I find rottentomatoes to be pretty damned good. It is a WHOLE lot better than IMDB.
As an unrelated side note, if a person likes anything by Michael Bay or Roland Emmerich, then it is pretty easy to understand why you wouldnt understand or appreciate critically praised or good movies (which I realize are not the exact same thing)...
![]()
So what is a good movie?
Congratulations, but that is exactly the ammo more likely to work because they use the old-timey mercury fulminate primers, banned from further production since 2002. Modern health and safety concerns have made for a "greener" primer composition, usually potassium chlorate, that will not have anywhere near that type of shelf life. How much of that old timey medicine (mercury fulminate primed ammunition) would be laying around in 2040, after thirty years of anything goes following a cataclysmic war?
Originally Posted by Boats
I haven't enjoyed a post-apocalyptic movie since both The Road Warrior and Max Max--Beyond Thunderdome. They set the standard for a uniform and believable dystopia. It probably helped immensely that Director George Miller also co-wrote both movies as well as the original Mad Max, which was set in time close before the nuclear war that is the backdrop of the sequels.
Most movies in the genre, such as I Am Legend, to take a recent example, simply feature too many anachronisms, like electrical power from nowhere, easy fuel, working automobiles that aren't cobbled together garbage, mountains of ammunition, and elaborate defensive systems that would have never been put together by just one guy.
Other horrible examples have even featured cigarettes--(I'm talking about you Waterworld,) or something else that totally ruins the illusion.
I doubt this one is different. It takes exceptional writers and a visionary director to pull the material out of the present and transport it to the imagined low-tech and barbaric future. The Mad Max movies aren't perfect, (who does Tina Turner's hair every day and with what? Why is S&M leather popular in the desert when it gets cold at night?), but they are the gold standard.
For The Book of Eli I saw non-smoking, mostly unmodified, cars and delivery vans, a chainsaw that fires up on the first go, a perfectly working RPG-7 warhead, and plenty of primer using, magazine spring dependent, recoil spring dependent, lubrication dependent, semi-auto pistols running around a very impoverished world set after a post apocalyptic war--30 years on--just in a trailer, so I am not too encouraged.
Oh yeah, and a slow motion arrow, the wooden shaft of which does not oscillate from point to tail while in flight, the very motion that the fletching has been compensating for going on centuries now.
It is way easier to suspend disbelief when the directors give a damn about the little details that otherwise poke holes in the viewer's efforts to join their world. It's this very reason why the most memorable science fiction has been done by visual detail fanatics who can succeed even in the face of crappy plots and dialogue, (George Lucas, James Cameron among others).
Watch The Road. All I'm going to say.
That goes for all of you.
Watch The Road. All I'm going to say.
That goes for all of you.
Posted by Spenceds
Yeah you see History of Violence, that was another one I liked with Viggo Mortenson(?)