I don't see the negative fuss. It's not that far off from a lot of the Filipino designs, which seems to be fairly widely regarded as good choppers. Jerry is definitely inspired by Filipino designs (no, I've never met him or talked with him online, but I've seen his work on his table at Blade as well as in various publications). They are often used as both tools and weapons. Why's that a problem, exactly?
You have the same sine curve that drops the chopping sweet spot below the level of your knuckles that you see in a lot of the Filipino choppers, and is something I incorporate in my own bush swords. The shape of the spine is to a large extent stylistic, though weight distribution is part of the function. I don't see the squarish angle on this spine to be that different from a khukuri, and don't see anything that would negatively impact weight distribution.
The point is definitely stabby (once again, I have no problem with a big blade having weapon applications as well as brush), but with the straight edge leading up to it would work nicely as a two-handed skew chisel. And I don't usually chop with the tip, m'self.
It's hard to get a solid idea of how a handle feels from a picture, but I've always thought that Jerry's handles look like they would lock solidly in the hand. I'd have to hold one to see for sure what I thought of it, but it looks good. The pointy pommel would sure poke a hole in a baddy's temple if need be, and I don't see it getting in the way during regular use.
There are a few things I'd do differently building something along those lines myself (and I do, which is one of many reasons no one would ever confuse something I make with something Jerry makes; the forge finish might be another thing

), but as far as basic design and physics, it would be pretty similar.
I understand if the style isn't someone's cup of tea, but I don't see anything that tells me, as a person who's cleared a lot of brush, that it wouldn't work well in that role.