To be clear, there is no magic here. None. Zero. Just hard work and careful planning.
I designed a knife to do what I wanted it to do. Nathan built the best tool he could in order to achieve a particular outcome. Dan lent his ergonomic knowledge in order to make everything function as it should. The input from these three sources have coalesced into something that I've been chasing for years. I've used knives that come close, but as a complete, mission specific, package, this is the pinnacle- from my point of view.
People can criticize my technique. They have in the past and will in the future. They have, and will continue, to miss the point.
What I try to convey is that my technique is shaped by the environment which this tool was designed to excel in; wet, muddy places with shitty footing, extra layers of clothing, awkward cutting angles and positions, a wide variety of targets which vary in density, weight, tension, hardness etc. and user fatigue brought on by many tiring, abusive hours in the field.
Any jackass can buy a pine 2x4, clamp it in his vise and plan his cuts in order to get through it as quick as he can. It might help that your knife weighs 3lbs in this scenario. I don't care about that. This knife was not designed for that. I have to carry it around. In terrible weather. Through off trail rainforest conditions. Sometimes drunk. AND it has to cut like a motherfucker.
So please, leave your critique of my technique aside. It doesn't matter. You probably don't do what I do. The important thing is that this knife can handle it. It was made to handle it, irregardless of your technique. And by 'it', I mean pretty much anything you'd expect a knife like this to handle. Go ahead and chop your 2x4, and if you can do a better job of it than this guy, I'll pay attention to what you have to say.
[video=youtube;TvUsh5FijcY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvUsh5FijcY[/video]