oldmanwilly
Gold Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2014
- Messages
- 3,492

I don't know if anyone here is familiar with the Cedric & Ada YouTube channel - it's a nerdy Aussie who likes to test/compare edge retention across hundreds of knives. In one of his videos he said something that stuck with me, loosely paraphrased as:
In a small blade, it makes sense to have a harder steel with higher edge retention. You only have a small edge to work with, requiring you to use most, if not all, of the edge for each cut. Therefore you're better off with a harder steel that requires sharpening less often, even if it is more difficult to sharpen. Whereas, in a larger blade you have a larger edge and can get away with less edge retention because you can cut with different parts of the edge as other areas become dull.
I think there is a fair bit of truth to that sentiment and am therefore glad that Case is exploring better steels. However I'm not sure most people would agree since most people aren't BF members who have the understanding and patience to maintain harder, wear resistant steels.
I wonder if a high hardness AEB-L would be the better choice: stainless, good stability with thinner stock, good edge retention, and easy to sharpen with nearly any method. Sort of like a stainless steel that behaves like a good carbon steel.
Last edited: