Cliff Stamp
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 5, 1998
- Messages
- 17,562
ghost squire said:I understand now. When I saw Ray Mears pry apart a log with his knife for the first time it gave me a start!
They are not focused light cutting tools though they get promoted this way by some. I was impressed with them with I first handled them years back, but that is quickly replaced once you see what someone can do with use of proper primary grinds. The benefit of carrying something ground in that way as opposed to an knife designed just to cut well is that the thicker blade can take more strain. If you were as rough with one of Alvin's blades as Mear's was with his woodcraft blade it would leave Alvin's in pieces.
This is of course the same arguement that Skammer makes in preference for his type of knife, he just sets a different breakpoint for toughness. If having to chose between one of Alvin's O1 utility knives, or Mora 2000 or Howling Rat for wilderness survival, he would likely take the Howling Rat. Everyone is free of course to find the optimal level of strength/toughness for them and you would not expect it to be the same for everyone.
My brother is 6'4" and very physically capable should he and a 65 year old woman have the exact same choices of ideal "survival" gear for wood craft? You want to be able to make the most of your resources and your strength is an obvious one. There was a nice bit on this in one of the STIHL series when they interviewed Ryan, the axe selection, even for the same wood, cut the exact same way, changes dramatically from one guy to the next. In general the really strong and heavy guys run larger axes and heavier saws because they are more efficient with them as it suits thier resources. The lighter guys can't match that power so they make up with it in speed and thus change gear.
Now in general, outside of competition you don't actually chop/saw in that way because it is too dangerous, it is harder on the equipment and your fatigue rate is way to high. However the same general principles of gear selection hold. In regards to Mear's rougher work, it is done to save him time, he could do all of it by precision cutting, it is just much faster at times to twist and pry. Skammer simply prefers a greater cross section which gives more prying force and can thus do some things even faster, but other things not as well, it depends on your abilities and methods.
Does a knife really need to be that thick though?
At the edge, no, not even close. It is insanely difficult to break an edge even 0.030" thick, and you won't do it by anything Mear's does. I have seen (as I have asked) fairly strong guys with no idea what they were doing split wood by batoning and just pile driving the knife through knots and the edge holds up fine. I wanted to see just what would be needed for a real survival situation by which I would take to include high stress, lots of exertion and improper methods. Few people in such situations remain calm, and having your survival tools so optimized that they would shatter if so used doesn't seem sensible to me.
Even if you are so skilled and clear headed that you never get overstressed and always use proper methods, does everyone around you. Do you really want to carry equipment that only you can use in a survival situation? Moving higher, the only reason to climb above 0.030" is for chisel cutting metals, which can be useful in some survival situations, probably more urban than wilderness. Justin's early RD knives for example had this class of edge because that was what he found was necessary for his "survival" uses in his rather extreme enviroment.
-Cliff