I've never understood why the differences/geometry involved are so "controversial". It's funny how such a simple thing like a knife blade can arouse so much hatred in some folks, and rabid adoration from different people. A chisel grind is nothing more than a V-grind canted a couple degrees in relation to the handle.
It's not so much the grind style that causes problems, but the angles involved. Many production knives (especially "tactical" ones) are too damn thick and not ground acutely enough regardless of style... that only magnifies any issues with the knife not cutting straight or performing well in general. I do actually like a well-ground full-height chisel grind, even on a 3-4" blade - they cut just fine
in one hand or the other. On a wider kitchen knife, they slice
extremely well; not just for fish and meat but on veggies too. But I make very few of them because they're just not as versatile as a normal FFG.
I have only one real problem with chisel grinds - percieved value. A V-grind cost more to make (all other factors equal) than a chisel grind. I don't see an increase in value in a knife with a chisel grind. I see a knife that during production takes 50% off the set-up time in the grinding portion of production process. In a chisel grind with a steep grind I see another way of cutting cost, saving money on grinding belts and time.
You're sort of right... makeready is kind of simpler. To a handmade maker, that's really not going to matter... to a largely-automated factory cranking out 1000 blades at a time I imagine it does add up.
But you're still removing the same amount of steel as on a V-ground knife, assuming the grind height/stock thickness/included angles are the same. So I suspect any cost-savings on belts/wheels is pretty negligible if it exists at all.
As for manu's charging more for chisel grinds... are there actual examples of a company selling the same pattern with a V-grind for less than the same pattern with a chisel grind?