- Joined
- Oct 3, 1998
- Messages
- 81
Cliff,
1) Spyderco sells a knife for $100 because (a) it injection molds plastic handles; CR machines titanium, (b) Spyderco subcontracts out where labor rates are less; CR, I assume, pays his people US rates, (c) Spyderco has far more volume, they can amortize setup costs over more knives, (d) Spyderco uses lock-back designs on their $100 folders which, when setup correct, are basically snap-together units, CR hand mills each piece, etc.
Why are knock-offs $3?
Are you sure you have the right term here???
Don't you mean rip-off instead of knock-off???
I think both Sal and McClung have gone into great detail on this issue before. The $3 knock-off has big advantages (a) because the knock-off manufacturers had to spend $0 in design, prototyping, etc. and (b) labor rates are lower in China than Taiwan, Mexico and Japan, (c) materials - can you be sure that on a $3 rip-off knife when it says ATS34 on the blade, are you going to believe it???
1) Spyderco sells a knife for $100 because (a) it injection molds plastic handles; CR machines titanium, (b) Spyderco subcontracts out where labor rates are less; CR, I assume, pays his people US rates, (c) Spyderco has far more volume, they can amortize setup costs over more knives, (d) Spyderco uses lock-back designs on their $100 folders which, when setup correct, are basically snap-together units, CR hand mills each piece, etc.
Why are knock-offs $3?
Are you sure you have the right term here???
Don't you mean rip-off instead of knock-off???
I think both Sal and McClung have gone into great detail on this issue before. The $3 knock-off has big advantages (a) because the knock-off manufacturers had to spend $0 in design, prototyping, etc. and (b) labor rates are lower in China than Taiwan, Mexico and Japan, (c) materials - can you be sure that on a $3 rip-off knife when it says ATS34 on the blade, are you going to believe it???