3Guardsmen said:
I'm still interested in that "editing error" in the DVD, the one where the "Night Force" morphs into the "Scimitar" while in the vise. Any word on that yet?
FWIW, I agree with Cliff. How do you determine where the "this constitutes abuse" disclaimer in the "Proof" and "More Proof" videos ends. Is repeatedly cutting rope "abusive"? Is continually cutting cardboard "abusive"? If I decide to cut hanging pieces of meat, have I "grosely abused" my CS knife?
You said a few times that we, the consumers, don't need to repeat those tests, because "the company has done it for us". Well I for one don't put much trust in a company that says "we've done the testing for you", especially if that company is looked upon with a bit of scepticism. If CS would make videos of a third party, like...oh...say....Cliff Stamp, beating the snot out of their products, I might believe the hype. Until then, I don't buy (literally and figuratively) their products.
Best wishes,
3Guardsmen
Perhaps I am misunderstood on a couple points re. the dvd.
First- the video does state, both in text and narration, that
some of the tests constitute abuse. Surely if you are using the knife in a normal manner like cutting rope, etc., and it fails due to a manufacturer's defect, I can guarantee that the company would make it right. But some of the extreme behavior and demonstrations are certainly not normal use or wear and tear and do constitute abuse. If we are going to be intellectually honest and not just knee-jerk with our reactions, we have to admit that some of the tests certainly fall into the abuse catagory. Failure under misuse and abuse is not covered under most warranties for most products.
Second- as to the "the company did the test for you" bit, I can see why there is a bit of mistrust with that statement. Understand where I am coming from. I am not in a position where I am going to spend money on any product and torture it to the point of destruction just to prove a point. I think that most consumers are in the same position. 1Katana seems to be the exception rather than the rule- admitedly due to a "Vegas Cash Surplus"- sould that we all were so lucky in Vegas

- So why spend hard earned money to destroy something just to bicker with the company. Buy the product you like or want to try, use it as is appropriate, and if it fails, then you have the warranty to fall back on.
As for 1Katana- congratulations- I hate you

. Thank you for your unbiased "Proof" on your own. Speaks a lot for the product and your sense of adventure.
Some of the things I have heard of regarding CS warranty claims:
1 guy tried to split bullets with a Tanto- by putting it into a vice and shooting at the edge. Split one, then broke the edge with the 2nd shot. Then apparently got very angry when the company denied the warranty, though a hefty discount was offered on a new knife.
Voyager swallowed by a cow. The steel survived, but the zytel handle was destroyed. After the knife "passed" through the cow, it was returned for a warranty claim (yea, I know, gross). The customer was offered a deep discount on another one, since the warranty did not cover digestion.
I'll get more of those to share- gives you an idea of what some users expect to do with thier knives.