- Joined
- Jul 30, 2006
- Messages
- 44,247
That's great news, and I'm astounded. Have you done corresponding tests of Cold Steel's AUS8? I've always been curious as to the differences between VG-1 and AUS8.
Given the performance of VG-1 in your tests, it still seems to hold its own without needing 420 slabs. (BTW, someone earlier said that it was 420J2. That's not true...420J2 isn't applied to the San Mai knives.)...
.
I've not tried Cold Steel AUS8. However, I have run comparisons between VG1 at 59HRC and AUS8 at 59HRC. The VG1 holds an edge noticeably better than AUS8.
his tests do not involve the lateral strength or corrosion resistance of the blade...
True enough. The reason for the lamination is to increase toughness and corrosion resistance, rather than to increase edge retention.
Like I said in post 19 on the first page of this thread. Cold Steel's purpose in using laminated steel was to produce a stainless blade that has the toughness and edge retention properties of the Carbon V blades. Laminated AUS8 should do that. So should laminated VG1, except that laminated VG1 will have superior edge retention to that of Carbon V or 1095.