Dalerich & His Trade Offer

G3, if you're going to quote something, be sure to get it right. ;)

I posted at 11:05. You edited at 11:08. Nice try but the foot in mouth is still yours. I quoted all of what was there at the time. Now you can add a :jerkit: as well.
 
I posted at 11:05. You edited at 11:08. Nice try but the foot in mouth is still yours. I quoted all of what was there at the time. Now you can add a :jerkit: as well.

It was a joke G3... lighten-up!

Now you want to get pissy like a little kid... maybe if you took the time and had the patience to hear this out in the 1st place. Maybe Dale would have explained himself.
 
That's arguable.

Regardless, you've been nominated. Congratulations.

Have some cheese with your whine.
 
and why's that Garret?

Because I posted in the GB&U Forum?

Why don't you explain yourself?

Is it because the nay-sayers said so?

Does it make it better to get personal?

I'm a 50 year old Father of 6, 3 in college, 1 in the Military, 1 in high school and 1 in grade school. And a Grandpa of 2.
I'm disabled and trying to make ends meet, like most people I know.

So now what?
 
I was just thinking about all of this, and seeing I called Dale out, why hasn't he explained in his own words how he didn't renig on a deal?
Why haven't you proven that he has? All we have are your unsubstantiated accusations. It may well be Dale reneged, but you haven't proven it.

No offense intended, Franklin, but you're starting to come across as a bit of a nutjob, IMO. You claim that you really don't care what others think of you, but you might find yourself thinking otherwise next time you go to bid on a knife here, or offer a trade, and the respondent turns you down because he or she would rather not do business with you because you're perceived to be more trouble than you're worth.
 
Because you call someone out over "renegging" on a deal when there is no proof of a "deal". You have lost nothing.
Then you badger him to post email about another deal with someone else that you think you saw him "reneg" on.
Once again he comes back and politely states his case despite your vulgarity.
You put it on him to provide emails that you should be posting since you called him out.
Others have stated they did not have a problem and would like you to post them. You still do not. So now you are doing us all the disservice of retaining in secret this ever-so valuable and incriminating evidence.
On top of all that, you're starting to come off sideways. It was explained to you that "no harm, no foul" is better than risking your reputation but you don't seem to care or understand.

What do you expect?

and why's that Garret?

Because I posted in the GB&U Forum?

Why don't you explain yourself?

Is it because the nay-sayers said so?

Does it make it better to get personal?

I'm a 50 year old Father of 6, 3 in college, 1 in the Military, 1 in high school and 1 in grade school. And a Grandpa of 2.
I'm disabled and trying to make ends meet, like most people I know.

So now what?
OK. What does this have anything to do with conduct? If anything, I would expect a more reasonable response.
 
The only thing I expected, was to call Dale out on his unethical dealing practice and have him explain himself.

Instead, it turned into a pissing contest.

For that, I'll appologize. :thumbup:
 
I was just thinking about all of this, and seeing I called Dale out, why hasn't he explained in his own words how he didn't renig on a deal?
Why haven't you made a case to prove that Dale renigged? You've made plenty of whining posts about being wronged without providing one bit of evidence. The hilarious part is that you expect accusee to provide the details...when you are the one making the case against him? :confused:

Let's break it down in simple terms:
  1. Accuser makes a thread. In case you just got here, YOU are making the accusations.
  2. Accuser presents evidence. We're still waiting. :rolleyes:
  3. Accusee defends himself. What you are expecting Dale to do right now, and yet you have yet to do the second step?
Gee, you haven't managed to present any evidence than to create this thread and say "You did me wrong"; but then you keep whining about it when people press you to provide the details. I see lots of people here backing up Dale, and no one protecting your "reputation". If you expect a "trial by reputation" without presenting any evidence, you will get hung.

Do you call the police to come arrest people "just because"? :rolleyes:

Any wonder why you are getting taken to the lash?

Franklin said:
Instead, it turned into a pissing contest.
Present some evidence, or let the thread die.
 
Let's break it down in simple terms:

1. Accuser makes a thread. In case you just got here, YOU are making the accusations.
2. Accuser presents evidence. We're still waiting.
3. Accusee defends himself. What you are expecting Dale to do right now, and yet you have yet to do the second step?

Where in the hell did you come up with that? :foot:
If what I originally posted doesn't satisfy you, get over it!

If I had 10,000 posts here, would it make a difference?

It's fasinating how all of this goes sideways, when the accused posts an email then clams-up without any follow-up... especially of his own suggestion of posting the unedited emails.
If you'd read all of this, you would have noticed 2-weeks worth. Now you know... it's not worth it.
Obviously he picked the email to post. Screw him! All I know, he screwed me over, with jacking around for 2 weeks. If he was going to keep his figgin' knife, he shouldn't have accepted my Strider PT in trade.
 
Here's some evidence to the contrary...
TallPaul ... GOOD

--------------------------------------------------------------

I have just completed another purchase from TallPaul. Everything went well and as an added benefit we had a nice conversation regarding knives. I just upgraded my membership to gold, because without Bladeforums I would not have had the opportunity to meet Paul and other knife nuts.
Thanks Spark for all your work.
Dale Richmond
That's Bullshit... Dale is dealing in knives without the upgrade!
 
Where in the hell did you come up with that? :foot:
If what I originally posted doesn't satisfy you, get over it!
Apparently, I am not the only person here who "isn't satisfied" with your evidence.

If I had 10,000 posts here, would it make a difference?
If you were the President of the United States, could you have someone arrested and jailed for no crime? Evidence speaks, and you've provided none - other than crying foul.

It's fasinating how all of this goes sideways, when the accused posts an email then clams-up without any follow-up... especially of his own suggestion of posting the unedited emails.
If you'd read all of this, you would have noticed 2-weeks worth. Now you know... it's not worth it.
Obviously he picked the email to post. Screw him! All I know, he screwed me over, with jacking around for 2 weeks. If he was going to keep his figgin' knife, he shouldn't have accepted my Strider PT in trade.
And you don't have the same emails to post? People have been asking you to post the emails since the beginning.

And as far as getting bent out of shape because he won't post "the evidence" to "prove you right"...what country are you from? Are defendants expected to incriminate themselves where you are from?

I could care less about who is right between you or Dale...but what I do care about is your asinine expectation that someone should be "guilty" in a court of peers because you say they are, without any evidence to suggest otherwise. And then you get your panties in a bundle because he won't incriminate himself. :jerkit:
 
G3, when you get my age, you seem to care less about what someone else thinks....

So G3 you see, you have put your foot in your own mouth. ;)

Franklin, what G3 is trying to tell you nicely is you're coming off as a dickhead who cries about situations you created. And then you want the person you're starting crap with to prove that you are right about them?:confused: And it may not bother you what people think of you but see how well that goes for you the next time you see a knife you want to trade for.
 
So,did you delete all the e-mails or do you have them? Why are you side-stepping the issue of posting them? Just giving a straight answer to this would be helpful for your side of the story.
 
Yes. As long as you don't use a local prison to torture them.:o
LOL I realized the error in saying this after I posted it... ;) :D

But realistically...at some point even the POTUS would have to answer for wrongfully jailing somebody for no reason... That's what due process is all about, thanks to the 5th and 14th Amendments. :thumbup:
 
To Dalerich, and your Trade offer

After jerkng around with Dalerich for 2-weeks, he decides to keep his knife.
That's fine and dandy. However, under the circumstances I felt he earned a "walk-of-shame", due to his :jerkit:

My final response to him...

Hello Dale Richmond, I understand clearly now. I understand you have a (retail) $200.00 knife and you clearly were not dealing in good faith.
Had you been dealing in good faith...
1 - you would have replied to my email's in a timely manner, instead of putting me off.
2 - you would not have tentively agreed to my initial trade, in the first place...
3 - jack-around for two-weeks.
Sir, I personally think you're an asshole.

Here's my original post, and whoever wants to critique it, add to it or whatever... go for it.
 
And it may not bother you what people think of you but see how well that goes for you the next time you see a knife you want to trade for.

That pretty much sums it up 100% right there.

Hope he didn't have plans to do alot of trading on here, because he has pretty much torched that bridge.

EMOTICON-Tribe.gif
 
Back
Top