Not sure what it is with this forum sales board but I'm sick and tired of the numerous dishonest sellers.
Of the very few transactions I've made on this forum I've been burnt 3 times now on items being described as brand new, like new, new & never been carried.
The last one was the worst, I PM'ed and asked what is the condition of the items as the photos were so poor to which the seller PM'ed me the items are new.
Well.....what I got was disgustingly filthy, heavily worn , full of dents, scratches, chips, scuffs, bits falling off and partly chemical eaten. They were beyond beater condition.....was the seller blind? I would have thought it was a joke if I personally knew the seller.
Came out with some lame excuse about I got them in trade and didn't really look at them...pathetic excuse for dishonesty. I'm waiting on a refund on that one otherwise I'm going to town on them.......
My first Hinderer XM-18....."never been carried"......it was in worse condition than the XM-18 a friend had EDC'ed for almost every day for more than a year......
I'm not going to name names yet as I'm giving one party the chance to put it right although it does not excuse his lousy practice.
There is far too much of the liberal and dishonest use of new/mint on items which are far from new.
Anyone else getting that same here?
There really needs to be some definition to the selling rules w.r.t. the condition of items.
The worst offender I purchased from is still selling beater items and not disclosing condition or stating new when the poor photos he uses can sometimes reveal the items are far from new - it is also amazing that they have no negative feedback......:uncomfortableness:
Of the very few transactions I've made on this forum I've been burnt 3 times now on items being described as brand new, like new, new & never been carried.
The last one was the worst, I PM'ed and asked what is the condition of the items as the photos were so poor to which the seller PM'ed me the items are new.
Well.....what I got was disgustingly filthy, heavily worn , full of dents, scratches, chips, scuffs, bits falling off and partly chemical eaten. They were beyond beater condition.....was the seller blind? I would have thought it was a joke if I personally knew the seller.
Came out with some lame excuse about I got them in trade and didn't really look at them...pathetic excuse for dishonesty. I'm waiting on a refund on that one otherwise I'm going to town on them.......
My first Hinderer XM-18....."never been carried"......it was in worse condition than the XM-18 a friend had EDC'ed for almost every day for more than a year......
I'm not going to name names yet as I'm giving one party the chance to put it right although it does not excuse his lousy practice.
There is far too much of the liberal and dishonest use of new/mint on items which are far from new.
Anyone else getting that same here?
There really needs to be some definition to the selling rules w.r.t. the condition of items.
The worst offender I purchased from is still selling beater items and not disclosing condition or stating new when the poor photos he uses can sometimes reveal the items are far from new - it is also amazing that they have no negative feedback......:uncomfortableness:
Last edited: