DLC/PVD Misinformation

My takeaway from Jim's video, was that DLC is much more of an expensive, and higher wear resistant coating. You're also not going to find true DLC coatings on a 50 dollar, or even 200 dollar knife. Jim stated his experience in the watch industry. True DLC, as he stated, is much more of an expensive process then PVD.

Granted, my knowledge on the subject is limited...I take everything with a grain of salt, including this thread.

Lets keep in mind, sticktodrum was awarded a free serial #2 ZT 0600 from KAI.

this entire post is based on second hand information, along with the source of information's credibility being both questionable and in my opinion negatively biased.

it's already been shown that PVD (Physical Vapor Deposition) is a process not a coating.

It quite honestly irks me you keep bringing this up. What's your point?

Kirby
 
I happened to reference this in one of my videos after watching Skelton's video. I honestly should have done my own research. Jim does have experience in the watch industry with DLC so I honestly took his word for it. I wasn't bashing KAI in anyway, heck look at my channel, most of my reviews are on KAI products. I only mentioned in passing so to speak so I hope that this didn't but forth any misinformation to my viewers.
 
He made this thread because the idiotic claims made by someone on YouTube has spilled over into BF. He's correcting said claims in an attempt to stop it from spreading any further within this community.

Please post the links so I can read up. Thanks
 
No, it's not a particularly pervasive thing, but after seeing someone actually parrot Skelton's ignorant nonsense about DLC coatings (and after reading advice from someone wiser than myself) I figured why not start this thread.

While my background in material science is limited (but not nonexistent), I know enough to make the distinction between Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD), and Diamond-Like Carbon (DLC).

Physical Vapor Deposition describes a process, by which material is deposited onto another. The initialism only describes the process, not the coating material itself.

Diamond-Like Carbon describes a type of coating material, which itself may vary. It can be applied to a surface by way of a PVD process.

Here's a thread I saw on this a long time ago, actually on CPF:

http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?t=314537


It's surprising how much people will take at face value from a YouTube personality without even do much as looking at Wikipedia. Trying to start conspiracy theories in an attempt to look 'in the know' doesn't really help anyone.

If I've gotten something completely wrong or I'm way off base here, please feel free to say so, so I could modify the distinctions and not be under the wrong impressions.


I'm not bothered by folks who choose to debate a subject. I am however bothered when those folks choose to talk down to me as if they're somehow superior and actually call names like an 8th grade child. Allow me to explain my "ignorant nonsense"....

Yes, I was talking for about 20 minutes, and perhaps didn't clarify every point and use definitive terms that everyone would wholly grasp. My bad on that. Let me say it here as clearly as I can:

The supposed DLC coatings most manufacturers claim on their knives is not in fact true DLC as in Diamond Like Carbon coatings (applied in whatever manner). It is a lesser quality material that is far more easily scratched and marred applied using PVD process. It is not DLC but something else that is inferior (regardless of how it is applied, it is not DLC).

There is a vast difference in cost.

I apologize that I draw from my watch experience, and that causes confusion. In the watch world you coat surfaces in either IP (Ionic Plating), PVD or DLC. IP is the most common, least expensive and not the most durable. PVD is a step up in price and durability. DLC is the top of the line providing near ceramic like scratch resistance. SO I simply categorized the knife coatings as simply as this. My apologies for not being more detailed.

As i stated in my response on the video comments section: Some of y'all are way too anal. It's a general discussion. If someone says "Wow, the moon light is so gorgeous tonight", you're the kind that just has to tell them that the moon doesn't radiate light, but simply reflects light from the sun, so therefore, the reflected sunlight off the moon is gorgeous tonight. And PVD is the lowest rate of success and quality DLC is not applied that way. IBD and PACVD are the optimal ways of applying DLC.

So let me be clear... I am not ignorant on the subject, I simply chose my words poorly and didn't realize I had to be so unbelievably specific.

Regardless of application process used, DLC is the most wear and scratch resistant, so people want to buy anything in DLC. Knife brand marketing appeals to this and calls a clearly inferior coating "DLC" knowing that it is not. After speaking with a couple of makers, there is a true DLC that is very scratch and wear resistant, but it is very expensive and simply not able to be used on budget oriented knives. I was not calling KAI out specifically on this, I very clearly stated that this is widespread across the industry.


You know, I like Jim. He has a spotted past in the watch world and has lets say a reputation. I think he is a good speaker, has a good TV voice and he has does semi professional Youttube videos that I find interesting and entertaining. With that said I really wish he would fact check before saying certain things. In nearly any one of his videos he makes a statement that is 100% false. Many times it is hit your head on a brick wall wrong and you really want to say something. And I have tried but he seems to get defensive and starts removing subscribers. At first I dismissed some of his errors as innocent missteps but he has one of these in almost every video. Then you have his subscribers refeeding it to us and it gets tedious. I think what bothers me more than these mistakes is what I believe to be favoritism among what he collects. I have seen some of his videos where is is very critical of someones work for things I honestly cant verify even in his HD videos yet some makers seem to be able to do no wrong on knives that I can with out a doubt tell are flawed in his video.

I hate to come up with a conspiracy theory of my own but I honestly wonder if he trades good reviews for free merch. Because when i see him ranting and raving about a knife that has a blade tip peaking, poorly fit and sculpted scales and a very uneven grind as the one of the best knives he has ever handled I question the persons competence in being able to judge true quality and or their honesty. Either way I think he could have a successful venture in the knife game if he would stop pandering to his favorite makers and make sure he has his facts straight before he recklessly starts spreading miss information. Its one thing to be wrong and admit it but its a whole other scenario to habitually wrong because you dont feel you have anything left to learn. I think people in the public eye have an even greater responsibility to cross their T's and dot the I's.

Before more people start believing rumored BS, allow me to clarify for you right here.

The one person who chose to spread lies about me for over 5 years finally recanted his stories on his own website proving nothing that was said about me was true. Better late than never I suppose. It spread like a virus for years, and is now finally over.

So please don't try to use a crutch of lies in an attempt to discredit me.

How precisely would I be getting free stuff? My overviews are on my own knives that I buy myself (many of which members here know I have bought off the forums), and Guest Blades episodes are knives sent in by people who own the knives.

And it wouldn't matter either way honestly. I give pros and cons to every knife I have put under my lens. If KAI had approached me and sent me a free ZT, that'd be swell... but the same statements would have been made in that case as well.

I allow people to comment however they wish. I have banned exactly 3 people from my YT channel, and only for being belligerent to my subscribers.

That all being said, I'm no expert, never claimed to be. As a matter of fact I have repeatedly stated this on several videos. I'm a collector and enthusiast who is growing and learning as I go along, enjoying it for what it is.



I hope this helps.
 
Oh lawd. It's this kind of silly crap that got the Kai forum closed. What's next? I think its pretty clear that folks are reading too deeply into what Jim said. In any case he's pretty much cleared it up but I think he did miss one slight detail that would help prevent further ridiculous comments from other, more stuck-on people...PVD isn't a specific coating. It could be almost anything. I'm not sure what the coating actually is in this case but his point is, that coating is not diamond like carbon. Yes pvd could deposit dlc but it is inferior to the real deal. I work for one of my electrical engineering professors as a research assistant and I do PVD almost daily growing molybdenum disulfide which would never be applied to knives or watches...so just because Jim says pvd doesn't mean you should all get upset about it. It need not rend our community.
 
So can we keep in mind the mostly unwarranted claims you have made concerning the 0560 and the 0600's? I'm sure I can dig them up around here somewhere...

Trying to right a wrong is all I see here. A simple reminder to check your facts. Links were provided by sticktodrum and agile_1. That's better than simply saying you know what you are talking about when you don't is it not?


Unwarranted? Again, Just sticking to the facts on my 0561, and my 0600. I can't comment on anyone elses.

If I thought there wasn't a problem with that 0561, I never would of got rid of it. It was a nice knife, I own many frame locks and almost none of them exhibited that sort of behavior. My Bradley Alias did have lock slip issues as well, and that was rectified by Benchmade over a year ago.
 
It is my understanding that DLC is a coating, and PVD is a process that is used to apply coatings.

In this paragraph you seem to understand that PVD is a process, not a coating:

The supposed DLC coatings most manufacturers claim on their knives is not in fact true DLC as in Diamond Like Carbon coatings (applied in whatever manner). It is a lesser quality material that is far more easily scratched and marred applied using PVD process. It is not DLC but something else that is inferior (regardless of how it is applied, it is not DLC).

But then you say this:

In the watch world you coat surfaces in either IP (Ionic Plating), PVD or DLC.

This would seem to indicate that you think PVD is a coating, not a process. It can't be both. So which is it, do you think PVD is a coating, or a process used to to apply coatings? You appear to think it is both.

If, as you have previously stated, PVD can not be used to apply true DLC then why are companies charging people hundreds of dollars to coat their Rolex watches in DLC using the PVD process?

[video]http://www.watchempiredesigns.com/our-services.php[/video]

I have a black coated Kershaw Barrage, Kershaw says it is DLC, you say it is not, I don't think I have to tell you who I believe.
 
I was using a ZT 0300 a year or so ago to open a huge bottle/tub of vitamins that had a thick paper seal with foil underneath it and it appeared that it had scratched the blade. It was the first time I'd scratched the blade (you always notice the first one) so I was a bit surprised but then went on to use the knife for the next year or so. Then, someone not long ago on the ZT sub-forum mentioned that something had scratched their DLC coated ZT and someone else chimed in that its more likely that whatever they were cutting had simply left material behind on the blades coating. I went in a opened a can of metal polish and wiped down the 0300 and I'll be damned if the "scratches" didn't buff right off...so even after a years use I hadn't scratched my 0300 let alone from the foil seal from a vitamin bottle.

I saw the Jim Skelton 0777M390 video a week or two ago but I have to believe that if ZT says that they use DLC then they use DLC. Let's be honest, ZT isn't having ANY problems selling knives, regardless if the blades are stonewashed or coated so why would they lie? I don't believe that they would. I have no doubt that Mr. Skelton believes that he's correct in his claims but I refuse to believe that ZT would lie about the coating they use on some of their knives. He was talking about his experiences with DLC in the watch industry and just maybe you can't compare that information to that of the knife industry. I don't know.
 
I have better things to do than over analyze what someone says on Youtube videos. The media does it everyday, just a part of life. If I want to get real facts, I'll do my own research and base my opinions on my own findings. After all this is a hobby, not a life or death situation. Relax!!
 
I have requested our Director of Engineering respond to this Thread.. George is a Doctor of Meterial Science at our Headquarters in Michigan, George has developed
and tested all types of PVD, CVD and PACVD SP2 and SP3 Diamond Like Carbon Films..

Ionbond also is very involved in coating of Watches at our Facility in Switzerland.. Providing DLC coatings to this Industry along with Millions of Automotive Engine parts
with both Metal Free and Metal Containing Low Friction Diamond Like Carbon Films..



Ionbond, thanks for posting in this thread. I look forward to the post from your Director of Engineering.

Looking at the direction this thread has taken, it might be better for a new thread to be started when he posts if it is meant to informational. Of course if he wanted to directly address any concerns or comments expressed in this thread I'm sure we'd all be interested.
 
I don't particularly care for coated knives anyways, but whatever coating KAI and Spyderco uses it is pretty durable in my experience.
 
So can we keep in mind the mostly unwarranted claims you have made concerning the 0560 and the 0600's? I'm sure I can dig them up around here somewhere...

Whatever could you mean? Maybe duro complaining about the 0600, while refusing to utilize (probably) the best warranty in the business, then trying to buy another 0600 shortly thereafter?

Say it ain't so Doc.
 
As far as I know,the PVD and CVD is a process to coat,but the DLC is just one headhunt of one kind common coating.QQ截图20131107004153.jpg
 
Hello Everyone,

I guess it is my turn to chime in on the PVD /DLC controversy.

Let’s begin with DLC’s (Diamond-Like –Carbon) coatings. DLC is an accepted term used in the scientific community to describe carbon coatings with an extremely broad range of properties. The properties range from the super hard, to the less hard, but more ductile coatings. When I speak of a less hard coating, I am speaking of a hardness that is generally greater than that of the harden tool steel that the coating is applied to!

If a DLC coating is not ultra- hard, it can still be a DLC – there is no attempt to deceive the public. In certain situations we want to increase ductility of the coating by reducing its hardness. As to the economics of the process, the machines capable of depositing DLC coating have become very large and extremely efficient. The knife, gun and automotive industries take advantage of the economics of scale to lower the per piece price of the DLC coating. DLC coatings do not have to be expensive provided that they can be coated in very large quantities.

If any coating is rubbing off without effort- it means that it was poorly applied or there was a process problem, end of story. No coating should rub off with a paper towel. Another aspect that we also need to bear in mind is that the texture of the blade can play a role in what we perceive. For example, the coating on a roughened blade may appear to wear more quickly than on a smoother surface. This is part due to the high peaks of the roughened surface being smeared or broken during abrasion.

I’ve gone on too long, but one final note. The term “PVD” seems to have been used in a negative context. PVD (Physical Vapor Deposition) as someone has already pointed out, is a broad term that describes processes that can and do deposit excellent, well adhered, high performance coatings, including but not limited to DLC’s.

All the best, George
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much for the post. It clarifies the situation, and answers some of my own questions also.



I'm not bothered by folks who choose to debate a subject. I am however bothered when those folks choose to talk down to me as if they're somehow superior and actually call names like an 8th grade child. Allow me to explain my "ignorant nonsense"....

Yes, I was talking for about 20 minutes, and perhaps didn't clarify every point and use definitive terms that everyone would wholly grasp. My bad on that. Let me say it here as clearly as I can:

The supposed DLC coatings most manufacturers claim on their knives is not in fact true DLC as in Diamond Like Carbon coatings (applied in whatever manner). It is a lesser quality material that is far more easily scratched and marred applied using PVD process. It is not DLC but something else that is inferior (regardless of how it is applied, it is not DLC).

There is a vast difference in cost.

I didn't call names at all. I called the information you purported to be fact, "ignorant nonsense." I still stand by that as an accurate assessment of it. It seems that what you originally said didn't make much sense, and it clearly came from ignorance on the subject.

To say you perhaps didn't clarify is a gross misrepresentation as well. You pontificated on the subject, acting as if you were letting some big cat out of the bag. When you use the word "actually" in what you're saying, you're stating it as fact. It's got nothing to do with lack of clarity, as you were quite clear in what you said. It's betrays your own charge of childishness to then back pedal and pretend that you didn't say what you did.

Even now, your clarification doesn't hold water and doesn't have any truth. Before Ionbond posted, without that information, you assert that it's inferior and less expensive, but don't give any more information. You don't say what it is, if it in fact isn't "true DLC" and don't share the sources of information that brought you to this [now erroneous] assertion.



As i stated in my response on the video comments section: Some of y'all are way too anal. It's a general discussion. If someone says "Wow, the moon light is so gorgeous tonight", you're the kind that just has to tell them that the moon doesn't radiate light, but simply reflects light from the sun, so therefore, the reflected sunlight off the moon is gorgeous tonight. And PVD is the lowest rate of success and quality DLC is not applied that way. IBD and PACVD are the optimal ways of applying DLC.

So let me be clear... I am not ignorant on the subject, I simply chose my words poorly and didn't realize I had to be so unbelievably specific.

Regardless of application process used, DLC is the most wear and scratch resistant, so people want to buy anything in DLC. Knife brand marketing appeals to this and calls a clearly inferior coating "DLC" knowing that it is not. After speaking with a couple of makers, there is a true DLC that is very scratch and wear resistant, but it is very expensive and simply not able to be used on budget oriented knives. I was not calling KAI out specifically on this, I very clearly stated that this is widespread across the industry.


Anal? Apparently standing behind one's words and what they say is something you look down on. It's nothing to do with general discussion or specificity. You said something that was demonstrably wrong, and clearly asserted to be speaking from a position of knowledge and authority. You should have admitted that. People should put value into what they say. Perhaps you don't though, but that's on you. If you don't stand behind what you say and hold yourself accountable for your words, then I don't know what to tell you. However it's not the fault of others who hear your words and take the proper meaning from them.

Either way, it seems that your couple of makers gave you incomplete information, but that also follows the pattern of non-accountability since the names of these makers aren't given. It seems that people should be willing to stand behind the truth, which is the case here with George from Ionbond. The company posted their response under their name, and the author signed his own name after the information. To me, that stands up above "a couple of makers."

Cheers.
 
Last edited:
That's a fantastic privilege for those out west! I would love to see the facilities and processes first hand. Thank you very much for the open invitation Mr. Lewis!
 
Back
Top