The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
CRKs don't function better than other knives - if function is defined as cutting, slicing, etc. That's something that CRK fans just make up in order to try to justify spending $450 for a dang pocket knife.
Okay, that's where my horse hockey meter starts making noise. CRKs don't function better than other knives - if function is defined as cutting, slicing, etc. That's something that CRK fans just make up in order to try to justify spending $450 for a dang pocket knife. In fact, a Spyderco Tenacious kills a cardboard box and peels an apple better than an Umnumzaan. A CS Voyager XL hacks and chops and pries better. And is grippier. Sebenzas are blingier, but the nuanced functionality stuff is a load of turkey giggle isn't it? Am I wrong?
Chris Reeve knives make some people feel good. And that's a very good thing if you are one of those people. But they don't function better. Let's keep it real here.
The interweb's most-watched knife reviewer (I'm guessing) characterized the Sebenza as a "douche knife". I'm talking about myself here and no one else, because sometimes I feel like a douche for paying >$1000 for 3 CRK knives that I almost never carry. I willingly got sucked in to the whole "greatest knife ever" thing. They are nice knives with close tolerances, like a lot of other nice knives with close tolerances. But when you get down to it, they don't chop a zucchini or cut open a burlap bag better than the $50 stuff. For some people, having a CRK in their pocket makes them feel good. And that's cool. But I call hog hockey on the better functionality stuff.
You always pop in out of nowhere and drop a WMD of knowledge. I don't get how you can always do this.
You got it perfectly. A Sebenza, if you boil it down, is little more than a fancy knife that isn't fancy (fancily designed). My Mini Grip (an elusive model with no QC issues) opens easier and smoother. My ZT 550 will handle abuse much better. My 300SN is more fun to play with. My Bobyk Icon is (in my eyes) classier. Even though every knife I have does something better, none of them can say they are a $300-500 knife that many people consider worth every penny and then some. If I say I have one of these in my pocket to another knife but, it isn'tfor bragging rights (ok the Grip is, just because it is a rare example).
Some people are just more attuned to the "finer things in life". Do I think $500 for a bottle of wine is moronic? Sure as a bear poos in the woods. Do I think $300k for a car is obnoxious, along with stupid? I'm not a person that understands the finer things. I prefer value over fashion, because my $70 Trip can do everything your Sebenza can, it just won't be as nice or as cool at it.
Different strokes for different folks, and haters gonna hate.
We will have to see if that is still true after 10-15 years of daily use.
My dad carried and used a plastic handled SAK for 25+ years before I bought him a new one. The only thing wrong with his was the spring was somewhat weak. That's a $20 knife.
I don't like the Sebenza. I'm sure it's a nice knife, but I just don't want one.
It is pretty interesting though how a couple of years ago, a thread like this would have come to insults and been locked in an hour or so.
Okay, that's where my horse hockey meter starts making noise. CRKs don't function better than other knives - if function is defined as cutting, slicing, etc. That's something that CRK fans just make up in order to try to justify spending $450 for a dang pocket knife. In fact, a Spyderco Tenacious kills a cardboard box and peels an apple better than an Umnumzaan. A CS Voyager XL hacks and chops and pries better. And is grippier. Sebenzas are blingier, but the nuanced functionality stuff is a load of turkey giggle isn't it? Am I wrong?
Chris Reeve knives make some people feel good. And that's a very good thing if you are one of those people. But they don't function better. Let's keep it real here.
The interweb's most-watched knife reviewer (I'm guessing) characterized the Sebenza as a "douche knife". I'm talking about myself here and no one else, because sometimes I feel like a douche for paying >$1000 for 3 CRK knives that I almost never carry. I willingly got sucked in to the whole "greatest knife ever" thing. They are nice knives with close tolerances, like a lot of other nice knives with close tolerances. But when you get down to it, they don't chop a zucchini or cut open a burlap bag better than the $50 stuff. For some people, having a CRK in their pocket makes them feel good. And that's cool. But I call hog hockey on the better functionality stuff
Okay, that's where my horse hockey meter starts making noise. CRKs don't function better than other knives - if function is defined as cutting, slicing, etc. That's something that CRK fans just make up in order to try to justify spending $450 for a dang pocket knife. In fact, a Spyderco Tenacious kills a cardboard box and peels an apple better than an Umnumzaan. A CS Voyager XL hacks and chops and pries better. And is grippier. Sebenzas are blingier, but the nuanced functionality stuff is a load of turkey giggle isn't it? Am I wrong?
Chris Reeve knives make some people feel good. And that's a very good thing if you are one of those people. But they don't function better. Let's keep it real here.
The interweb's most-watched knife reviewer (I'm guessing) characterized the Sebenza as a "douche knife". I'm talking about myself here and no one else, because sometimes I feel like a douche for paying >$1000 for 3 CRK knives that I almost never carry. I willingly got sucked in to the whole "greatest knife ever" thing. They are nice knives with close tolerances, like a lot of other nice knives with close tolerances. But when you get down to it, they don't chop a zucchini or cut open a burlap bag better than the $50 stuff. For some people, having a CRK in their pocket makes them feel good. And that's cool. But I call hog hockey on the better functionality stuff.
Another famous quote: A fool and his money..
For the price of one Sabenza I'd take 4 of these any day of the week: (Shows pic of digi/camo PM2.)
I don't understand this. I've bought over twenty Sebbies in the past year...every one used, And I pay $325 for a used Large...and I sell them quickly for $325, usually within a day of advertising on our Exchange. If you are picky, you can send it in for a Spa job for a few bucks, and it's as new again.The Sebenza, however, seemed like it didn't sell well if it was used.
Strider seems to offer more bang for buck personally.
The interweb's most-watched knife reviewer (I'm guessing) characterized the Sebenza as a "douche knife". ...sometimes I feel like a douche for paying >$1000 for 3 CRK knives that I almost never carry.
I don't own one. I wouldn't spend $100 on it.