Eagle Scout Lost on Mountain Fined $25,000 for Rescue

Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
20,082
I know times are tough, but gimme a break ...

CONCORD, N.H. — A Massachusetts teenager who spent three nights alone on Mount Washington in April after he sprained an ankle and veered off marked trails has been fined more than $25,000 for the cost of his rescue.

Scott Mason had been praised for utilizing his Eagle Scout skills — sleeping in the crevice of a boulder and jump-starting fires with hand sanitzer gel. But authorities say he wasn't prepared for the conditions he encountered and shouldn't have set out on such an ambitious hike.

"Yes, he'd been out there in July when you could step across the brooks. And people have been out there in winter in hard-packed snow. But with these spring conditions, it was soft snow, it was deep snow," said Fish and Game Maj. Tim Acerno.

Acerno said he believes Mason's fine is the largest ever sought under a 9-year-old New Hampshire law that allows lost hikers and climbers to be charged for rescue costs. Mason's rescue was particularly expensive because the helicopters the state typically used were unavailable, and a helicopter from Maine had to be brought in, Acerno said.

Mason, 17, of Halifax, Mass., had planned to spend one day hiking 17 miles in the New Hampshire mountains but ended up lost after he hurt his ankle and decided to take a shortcut. The shortcut led him into rising water and deep snow caused by unseasonably warm weather.

Mason was negligent in continuing up the mountain with an injury and veering off the marked path, Acerno said. Negligence, he said, is based on judging what a reasonable person would do in the same situation.

"When I twist my ankle, I turn around and come down. He kept going up," Acerno said.

"It was his negligence that led to him getting into that predicament," he said. "Once he was in that predicament, yes, that's what we praise him for — he used his Boy Scout skills, and that's why he's still alive."

Several states, including neighboring Maine and Vermont, have rescue repayment laws similiar to New Hampshire, though others tend to be more lenient. In Washington state, a bill that would have created a reimbursement system with fines capped at $500 never even made it out of committee this year. In New Hampshire, however, lawmakers made it even easier to charge for rescues last year when they changed the law to allow fines for those who acted negligently instead of the harder to prove standard of recklessness.

Related StoriesEagle Scout Lost on Mountain Built Cave to Survive
Search Under Way for Teen Hiker Missing in New Hampshire Mountains
New Hampshire officials have estimated that they could seek reimbursement in about 40 of the 140 or so rescues it typically handles each year. The money goes to the Fish and Game department's rescue fund. In most cases, hikers pay a few hundred dollars.

For the fiscal year that ended June 30, there were 131 missions that cost $175,320, Acerno said. He did not know how many of them resulted in fines.

Mason's family said they would not comment on the bill, which was mailed July 10. Mason has until August 9 to pay the bill; he could also take the state to court to contest the fine.



http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,533641,00.html
 
So let me get this straight. He twisted his ankle, and took a shortcut. Was that up the mountain or down it? The story says he went up the mountain.
Wierd...
 
Next thing you know the they'll be charging you hourly when you call the cops to report a robbery. :rolleyes:

I think it was a little stupid to keep going, but $25k? :confused:
 
So due date arrives...he's 17 and works at Burger King or something...exactly how much do they expect to collect come August 9th?

Yesterday I turned around four lost kids who were about to stumble into miles of wilderness...can I get 25 G's outta that deal?
 
wish they would do that here in BC, hundreds of UNPREPARED idiots a year thinking they just call on their cell phone for a pickup after they get lost, taking away resources from REAL rescues.
 
Did he ask to be rescued? Sounds like has was ok despite the ankle issue. Maybe SAR jumped the gun a little?
 
I got Nailed for a couple hundred in my late teens for going for a hike on a trail clearly marked as closed for Icy conditions.

I think thats a bit more reasonable. 25 grand seems a bit harsh, especially for this kid who diddn't seem too bad.

But I bet if we fined every dumbass for rescue we would have one hell of a Budget for our parks department.
 
Maybe if they took a credit card number and warned people they might be fined if they have to rescued at the start of the hike people might be a little more sensible about what choices they make.
 
This is pretty ridiculous. I volunteered for my local SAR team in high school and if we had ever expected anything in return I would have up and left. From what I remember of the story the guy walked out under his own power and SAR had never come close to finding him. He didn't ask to be rescued so he shouldn't be fined. I am pretty sure that he learned his lesson that day on the mountain. Beyond that 25k is excessive and will probably ruin this kids potentially bright future. I can see a few hundred or maybe even a couple thousand being reasonable, but this is just absurd.

Now people who use those ridiculous emergency beacons because they couldn't handle Alaska for more than 2 days are a completely different story...
 
One of my biggest concerns with this as a general policy is that it will provide more incentive for unqualified/unprepared to attempt self rescue. It is hard enough to train people to stay put in an emergency without adding a financial incentive to keep moving. Second, mild hypothermia often affects an individual's judgement, in such a state, what is the standard for negligence? I have no qualms in billing those who get lost as a result of criminal or egregiously reckless behavior, but the fact is that all wilderness activities carry some element of risk.
From a legal standpoint, who is responsible for the bill if another party made the call and it turns out the "rescued" party was never lost or in any imminent danger? Last I knew it wasn't illegal to not tell anyone where you are for a few days.
 
It's a slippery slope. People won't call for help in fear of being fined and it will end up costing lives. A lot of SAR situations are because of people being unprepared and careless, but they don't deserve to be fined or ultimately die.
How many people need to call an ambulance every year for being stupid or careless? That's what most accidents stem from. Can you imagine if they did the same thing for ambulances? Some guy is dying in the street, but no one will call for one in case they get fined.
 
Hopefully some lawyer will step up (free of charge) and fight the state on this one and make them look even sillier after.
 
$25,000?!?! You could buy two, one year old cars for that much!

If they had to fly a chopper in from Maine, that is there fault that there's wasn't available, they should absorb that cost.

On one hand I totally agree with the fines of unprepared people getting themselves into trouble and calling for a pickup. But I'm betting that this isn't the first long hike this kid has taken, and he messed up his ankle for crying out loud. You gonna fine an experienced outdoorsman for getting hurt and needing rescued? They can't control that, even the most experienced outdoorsmen/women get injured when out in the wilderness.


If I were that kid, I would just throw the ticket away, what are they gonna do come August 9th? Sue me? Here, you won the lawsuit, you get my shiny $800 car, my $100 bicycle, and the $200 I have in savings...

They oughta be charged for trying to take someones life away, I mean that is what they would be doing, if he lost out on an opportunity to go to college, if this in any way kept him from getting a job he could have otherwise gotten. A fine like that for a 17 year old is practically attempted murder.
 
Here we go again. :rolleyes:

Man, I wish this topic would be banned for political content whenever it comes up. It gets people at each other that are otherwise good friends.

Anyone that thinks fining someone $25,000.00 for something like this is just out of their mind.
 
I suppose should I ever go hiking there I'll have to file a request in writing that they not come looking for me if I get lost unless I call for it. At prices like that rescue loses a lot of it's appeal.
 
Who said the government even wants the Citizenry to be involved in things like hiking and camping? We keep hearing about how we have to preserve so many places that we serfs are not allowed to go for our children. But our children won't be allowed to camp there, either. What good is absolutely pristine wilderness if you can't see the place?

It's just a little off the beaten path, philosophically speaking, but anything that carries the stench of individualism is basically despised by control freaks in government. Stuff like this plays right into their hands in my view. Make people too damn scared to go out and enjoy what BELONGS TO THEM in the first place.
 
:eek: 25 grand for a simple rescue!!! I suppose when the rescuers show up they will have to start read a bit of "ver batim" stating that if they accept the pickup they may be charged up to $25,000.00 for the lift home :grumpy:

That sum of cash is proposterous, there goes his college, high school graduation, and that car he was saving up for just because he wanted to be a real american and get some fresh air.

I hope some lawyer steps up to help free of charge, J.
 
It's a slippery slope. People won't call for help in fear of being fined and it will end up costing lives. A lot of SAR situations are because of people being unprepared and careless, but they don't deserve to be fined or ultimately die.
How many people need to call an ambulance every year for being stupid or careless? That's what most accidents stem from. Can you imagine if they did the same thing for ambulances? Some guy is dying in the street, but no one will call for one in case they get fined.

That already happens....not as often as people who don't really need one call for them...but it does happen.

An injured man died here some years ago in route to the hospital. His wife wouldn't call for an ambulance because of the location. They had no health insurance and were just barely making ends meet and the "ambulance" would have had to be Life Force (our air ambulance), in which the ride starts at $10,000.00 and goes up based on other factors. I never heard the rest of the story but the last I heard the state was looking into pressing charges for her not calling for Life Force. Sometimes I think the lunatics have taken over the asylum. It's one thing to set a price higher than the average person can afford....but then to jail you for not taking the option you can't afford. I'm not saying anything else...no desire to go further into politics and opinions.
 
I think there is a difference between creating and promoting an environment of personal responsibility and accountability and something Draconian like this or anything remotely resembling this nonsense.
 
Back
Top