I live out in the mountains and recently heard a conversation that went similarly in a local shop. The proprietor of the shop made a similar argument against killing them to protect livestock (cows in this instance). He believed there are plenty of cows and coyotes should be protected as there are not a lot of them comparatively. Personally though I agree with the others, if I see one close enough to my house to be a threat to my dog or cats (rabbit sized animals) I would probably have to shoot it.
On a side note, I recently saw a mountain lion in my area. Fortunately for him I did not have the rifle on me. Funny thing about the mountain lion, the local game industry folks deny they exist in my neck of the woods, say they were wiped out. I would hate to kill something that is that close to extinct in the area, but they have been known to attack children in addition to small animals and there is a serious dilemma.
Well that confirms that rifles really can blow chunks out of people.
Well from that pic at least it was a clean kill, .338 Lapua is alot of gun to take to a picnic for Coyote but to each their own.
First: Have to agree. .338? That made me laugh, in a sick way... Next time will you post a .50 cal and a groundhog?

If you witness mountain lions where they are supposedly extinct, at least carry a camera or something- one thing I cannot stand is people saying animals are extinct where they aren't. I believe in disseminating truthful info, and if you see one, haul it in or snap a pic.
Zero
Last edited by a moderator: