Ed Fowler Eye Candy

RAN said:
a point about hypocrisy was made about (and Im paraphrasing here)marketing what is essentially utilitarian knives and selling them at a premium...well that is true but rampant
With all due respect, you didn't understand what I wrote because you stoped at the first part of the statement. I have no problem whatsoever with Ed selling his knives at any price he wants. I do have issues with the way he then turns around and disparage materialism and financial success.

One could disparage materialism and professional success and sell basic utility pieces at very low price to their idea of "honest workers", ranch hands, etc. Or, one could sell knives at luxury prices, mostly to professionally succesful types, and have the decency of at least paying them normal respect. But when a maker sells luxury knives and then criticizes materialism, I call that hypocrisy (it's also bad manners and poor marketing, but nevermind that).
 
Hey Joss
Apologies for my misinterpretation of your statements..and based on them I cant comment as I have not encountered any such comments coming directly from Mr. Fowler.
I would Find such words distressing but like I said I havent heard or read them coming from Mr. Fowler.
it is such a delicate balance art,craft ,form, function,marketing and integrity..
 
RAN said:
Hey Joss
Apologies for my misinterpretation of your statements..and based on them I cant comment as I have not encountered any such comments coming directly from Mr. Fowler.
I would Find such words distressing but like I said I havent heard or read them coming from Mr. Fowler.

http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=341893
Go to post #47:
For some folks materialistic goals dominate, new cars, diamonds, boats, big new houses. They live lives of quiet desperation for they will never be able to buy enough, next years model will be the fashion.
Some can and do live simply for the art of living well.
 
First of all I sure hope that the discussing of what everyones fingers smells like stops. There are some things that we just don't want to know.
Of course if I could come up with a guard material that makes your fingers smell like ..... then maybe I could sell alot more knives:D
I wonder if I'd be infringing on Jelly Belly jelly bean company:D

Once again as in many previous threads(and in life in general) it appears that the majority of this has become a matter of different people interpreting different statements in different ways and interjecting thier opions which then perpetuates the cylce.

Please don't get me wrong. I am not pointing fingers at anyone or saying that this is a bad thing but in fact just a natural flaw of human nature.
This is actually what keeps things interesting and helps to get the dust off a few keyboards at times and will hopefully with any luck help people to gain a better understanding of the topic.

With that said I'll pitch in my couple of pennies and probably wind up with my :foot: :D

As many of you know I've been studying under Ed making knives of my own and yes they all have sheephorn handles, brass guards and made from either 5160 or 52100. I still consider myself a "new" maker and definitely have alot to learn.

I have caught alot of flack over the fact that I am making knives similar to Eds however I am making them that way because I have owned one of Eds knives for over 12 years and have used it extensively. It has been in MHO everything he said it was.

That knife was a gift from my wife and yes I did at first wonder if I could ever take a knife that then cost around $1300.00 into the field and use it but then realized that that was what it was made for.

That first hunting season in helping family and friends it dressed out 2 elk, 5 or 6 deer and a couple of antelope without sharpening. While dressing out the animals the handle gets tacky rather than slick. When dressing out one of the elk it was well below zero, wind blowing and snowing and my hands were half frozen but I was still able to hold and control the knife due to the handle and guard.

The point is that I am making the style of knife I am making, and using the materials I am using, based on my own personal experiences and I like the way they work. I am not saying that they are right for everyone.

I know that Eds style of knives are the results of years of dedication, experimenting and hard work by Ed and his friends in developing his knives. I've seen the buckets full of destroyed blades that he has tested,the notebooks full of notes and data, the reports and letters from the metalurgist and most of all I know Ed and his dedication to making every knife better than the last one.

In reply to STevens quote
The part that I cannot understand is why certain makers get so entrenched with a specific steel as to be dismissive of other steels, in a contemptuous kind of way."

I can only say that it is a kind of dedication that is not often found in any trade.
Ed has put countless hours into developing methods to make the 52100 perform amazingly and has the resources to continue his quest for his Excalibur. Why would he abandon all that and start over?
I'm not saying that other steels aren't capable of performing equally or better but he has decided that the 52100 is a very capable steel and that there is great potential for it to perform to much higher levels than he's already achieved.

AS for the price we pay for what we buy, that is a subject that will forever be debated. We all have different priorities about how much we'll spend for different things.
I am self employed as a small general contractor who does most of my own work with an occasional hired hand and I'm a part time knife maker. My wife has her own business as a massage therapist. We are by no means well off but manage to make a living.

I hunt ducks and geese extensively and I currently use a Remington 870 express that I paid 200.00 for. It has been killing birds just fine for me for years but now I"ve been looking at a new Benelli Black Eagle for $1300.00. I'm still having a hard time deciding if I want to spend that much money and whether it would really be worth it. Every time I pick one up and feel how well balanced it is and think about how smooth it would shoot I almost give in and buy it.
On the other hand I guess I could start questioning why the Benelli costs more when it basically does the same thing as my Remington and that there are others out there that are priced less but I have researched the different shotguns and realize that the Benelli is it's own kind of shotgun and a proven design that works well and that the market has obviously supported thier existence. I could always spend 3 or 4 hundred less on a Winchester SuperX2 but I LIKE the Benelli better and feel it may be a bit more dependable.so that will be what I buy. You can darn sure bet that if I do buy one it won't be sitting at home because I paid $1300.00 for it and don't feel it should be taken out in the field.

Whether or not I wind up with one in the field with me next fall will depend on whether or not I decide to put that money into that or something else that I(or my wife) decides is more important.


The bottom line is that there are many different makers out there and if one makers products sell at a higher price then obviously there are people out there that feel it's worth the cost and he shouldn't be begrudged or slandered. If that maker has a backlog of orders then he's obviously doing something right. After all if people don't like one makers knives then that's just one more potential customer for other makers.


Hmmmmm...now I wonder what my wife would say if I told her I fought off the urge to spend 1300 dollars on a new shotgun but now I have a really great MS collection in the safe for just $60,000:D

Happy Hammerin, Butch Deveraux
 
Thanks for the link..
It's not my place to defend a statement like that..but this discussion is being conducted respectfully and as lng as we are not smearing anybody
i'll weigh in with my respectful and humble 2 cents.

I think the quoted comment by Mr. Fowler was a bit careless..probably in defense of a show that by most counts was sub par..but at one time was the shizz...there are economic realities most everyone has to deal..as a consumer if the wares are sub par,the travel and expense would not be justified. If the buyers not present..i dont see how it'd be worth a makers while to attend..friendships and lore aside.

I'm not in pusuit of the most the biggest the best or the next..(well maybe sometimes i'm guilty of that too;)
I admire and appreciate the craft..and usually collect from those who have an intense and cingular devotion and vision ...that sometimes comes at a premium.
I try to look at every piece on its own merit..I dont place value as much on materials be it ivory and damascus or carbon and curly maple..how is the piece conceived designed executed and finished..

What I personally find attractive about Mr.Fowlers work is just that..a puposeful design,stripped of excess..very much a reflection of the landscape and image of the maker itself..yet its simplicity belies decades in the pusuit of perfectionism and harmony.

I'll be the first to share my in hand feelings when the day comes..

very respectfully yours
Riad Nasr
 
Deveraux said:
First of all I sure hope that the discussing of what everyones fingers smells like stops. There are some things that we just don't want to know.

As many of you know I've been studying under Ed making knives of my own and yes they all have sheephorn handles, brass guards and made from either 5160 or 52100. I still consider myself a "new" maker and definitely have alot to learn.

I have caught alot of flack over the fact that I am making knives similar to Eds however I am making them that way because I have owned one of Eds knives for over 12 years and have used it extensively. It has been in MHO everything he said it was.

I know that Eds style of knives are the results of years of dedication, experimenting and hard work by Ed and his friends in developing his knives. I've seen the buckets full of destroyed blades that he has tested,the notebooks full of notes and data, the reports and letters from the metalurgist and most of all I know Ed and his dedication to making every knife better than the last one.

In reply to STevens quote
The part that I cannot understand is why certain makers get so entrenched with a specific steel as to be dismissive of other steels, in a contemptuous kind of way."

I can only say that it is a kind of dedication that is not often found in any trade.
Ed has put countless hours into developing methods to make the 52100 perform amazingly and has the resources to continue his quest for his Excalibur. Why would he abandon all that and start over?
I'm not saying that other steels aren't capable of performing equally or better but he has decided that the 52100 is a very capable steel and that there is great potential for it to perform to much higher levels than he's already achieved.

I am self employed as a small general contractor who does most of my own work with an occasional hired hand and I'm a part time knife maker. My wife has her own business as a massage therapist. We are by no means well off but manage to make a living.

I hunt ducks and geese extensively and I currently use a Remington 870 express that I paid 200.00 for. It has been killing birds just fine for me for years but now I"ve been looking at a new Benelli Black Eagle for $1300.00. I'm still having a hard time deciding if I want to spend that much money and whether it would really be worth it. Every time I pick one up and feel how well balanced it is and think about how smooth it would shoot I almost give in and buy it.

The bottom line is that there are many different makers out there and if one makers products sell at a higher price then obviously there are people out there that feel it's worth the cost and he shouldn't be begrudged or slandered. If that maker has a backlog of orders then he's obviously doing something right. After all if people don't like one makers knives then that's just one more potential customer for other makers.

Butch,

1. If your fingers smelled like garlic everytime you had to work with a particular material, you would grow not to like it.

2. You can defend your decision to make knives that look very similar to Ed's all you want, or you can learn to STRETCH. Bill Burke does just that. Although his more popular knives look like Ed's, the two that I own offer a nod to the master, but are truly the makers' own work. As much as I don't care for a lot of what Audra has been doing, she is truly outside of the master's shadow. It very simply, and trying to be nice here, shows a lack of imagination.

3. Some call what Ed does smoke and mirrors, but I don't think that has come up in conversation a lot in this post. This post is about value/cost. SOMEONE, somewhere may buy Ed's Master smith set for $60,000. The general consensus here seems to be that the set is worth $6,000 to $10,000 to US, a diverse group of collectors who buy what we like, and know what we like, at least at the core. Of this group, I include, Anthony Lombardo, Danbo, Megalobyte, RAN, PTG, Joss, Roger P., Murray White, Stephen Foster and a few others. Nobody who has the money has stepped in here to say "This set is worth the $60,000, and I'm buyin' it". That speaks volumes.

4. Luxury is luxury. A $2,000 using knife is a luxury. A $1,400 shotgun is a luxury. If you have one that works, that is called a necessity. If you have a more expensive one that works better, that is called a luxury. I have a ton of knives that I will never use, but I have some that get some hearty use, and some that are in the $800.00 range, about to get a serious thrashing. That is called the luxury of usage.

5. No one is begrudging Ed, or slandering him. Most of us have said that we like him. The discussion started out as the worth of the MS set, and changed from there. Nobody says that Ed makes a bad knife, except for Cleft Stump. What Ed does make IMHO is a fairly unattractive knife. Bill Burke makes knives that are better looking, again IMHO. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Edited by a fat guy who is married to a chubby

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
2knife said:
Stephen,
Are yu' freakin' sure you don't like BRASS?

..Really? (I can't believe you said that.) how many times. All this time I was hoping you'd change your opinion. I've been praying at night when I go to bed. "IF only Stephen would change his mind from his wicked thoughts about that golden metal,.. we'd all be happy again." ...but now, you'll probably just go to hell with all of those others.

Who is Stephen? Stephen Foster?

Ed,

The mods are doing their jobs. This is an adult discussion. Sorry you are ashamed of the analogy, but it fits.

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
2knife said:
THe people that are too high fashioned in taste and cynical will never get it. But, this has been an entertaining thread.

I think it is abundantly clear that you don't get it. The "it" that you don't get is that other people may hold an informed opinion that just happens to be different from yours. If it makes you feel better about yourself to disparage those with a different view - hey, whatever gets you through the day. But consider the absurd arrogance of your position: "If only they understood, they would surely agree with me." Puh - leeze.

Roger
 
STeven, my interpretation of your post and reply to your interpretation of my previous post. Aint this fun?????

Kohai999 said:


Butch,

1. If your fingers smelled like garlic everytime you had to work with a particular material, you would grow not to like it.

I didn't argue with you on that and now I'm glad that everyone knows you don't like your fingers to smell like garlic. And also, and I'm trying to be nice here, you don't have much of a sense of humor.

2. You can defend your decision to make knives that look very similar to Ed's all you want, or you can learn to STRETCH. Bill Burke does just that. Although his more popular knives look like Ed's, the two that I own offer a nod to the master, but are truly the makers' own work. As much as I don't care for a lot of what Audra has been doing, she is truly outside of the master's shadow. It very simply, and trying to be nice here, shows a lack of imagination.

I'm not defending my decision to make the knives I do. I don't feel the need to justify myself to anyone but me and those that appreciate what I'm doing by standing behind my products. I was simply using that to let people know why Ed charges what he does for his knives which is what this thread is about. Also so that they would know WHY I am making the knives I do and if they can appreciate that then perhaps they'll look me up when they want to buy a knife. If not then they may pass me on by and look elsewhere however I'm always happy to visit with folks whether they share my views or not. As far as walking in the Master's shadow I will admit that that is where I am at now because I am a relative new maker eager to learn. However, my goal is to someday be walking alongside that master along with others in the journey to a common goal that we both currently have and that is to make the best High Performance knife possible. As for my imagination it's doing just fine thank you. .

3. Some call what Ed does smoke and mirrors, but I don't think that has come up in conversation a lot in this post. This post is about value/cost. SOMEONE, somewhere may buy Ed's Master smith set for $60,000. The general consensus here seems to be that the set is worth $6,000 to $10,000 to US, a diverse group of collectors who buy what we like, and know what we like, at least at the core. Of this group, I include, Anthony Lombardo, Danbo, Megalobyte, RAN, PTG, Joss, Roger P., Murray White, Stephen Foster and a few others. Nobody who has the money has stepped in here to say "This set is worth the $60,000, and I'm buyin' it". That speaks volumes.

You're right the term smoke and mirrors hasn't come up in here however the value of his knives and the MS set is based on his knives performance.

For the purpose of this thread that general consensus is fine however I'm sure that there many more collectors out there which is why I'm sure Ed decided to list his collection in Bladegallery rather than for sale here.


4. Luxury is luxury. A $2,000 using knife is a luxury. A $1,400 shotgun is a luxury. If you have one that works, that is called a necessity. If you have a more expensive one that works better, that is called a luxury. I have a ton of knives that I will never use, but I have some that get some hearty use, and some that are in the $800.00 range, about to get a serious thrashing. That is called the luxury of usage.

Thank you for your definition of Luxury. I guess I'll have to go back to catalogs in the outhouse instead of the luxury of toilet paper. :D

5. No one is begrudging Ed, or slandering him. Most of us have said that we like him. The discussion started out as the worth of the MS set, and changed from there. Nobody says that Ed makes a bad knife, except for Cleft Stump. What Ed does make IMHO is a fairly unattractive knife. Bill Burke makes knives that are better looking, again IMHO. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Edited by a fat guy who is married to a chubby

I never said anyone was begruding or slandering Ed here. I was making a general statement of my idea of this wonderful thing we have called
FREE ENTERPRISE.

Happy Hammerin and God Bless our troops ,

Butch Deveraux
 
Gentlebeings;
Please lets keep this one on track.
Some great discussion.
Randy
 
DAVID, Good to hear from you and thank you for the kind words. As you can see I don't write on here very often but every now and then I feel compelled to write and express my views on a few things. I'm always aware that there'll be people that don't agree with my views but I welcome thier input anyway. I look forward to seeing you in Atlanta in June.

Now as Nick would say I'm going back to the sidelines with my soda and popcorn. :D


Butch
 
Deveraux said:
You're right the term smoke and mirrors hasn't come up in here however the value of his knives and the MS set is based on his knives performance.

Sorry Butch - I have to disagree with this. A $7,000 Fowler bowie is not 11X better than a $600 Cashen bowie, 7X better than a Howard Clark bowie, or 5X better than a Don Fogg bowie. This is simply not the case. I'm sure Ed's knives are very good, but they're not that good.
 
mckgreg said:
Seems appropiate.
Greg

And adds an amusing, quaint and childish touch to the conversation.

Thank you ever so much for both of your incisive and thoughtful inputs into this discussion. You have so much to say! I, and I am sure, we, all appreciate it!:jerkit:

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
The only thing I'd like to chime in with is I'm glad I found out where that sanmai Burke went!!! Saw it at Bladewest... after Daniel got it and thought it was the nicest blade there in the style I like...

As to the rest of this thread... Well, I find I learn things on this particualr forum at least once a week... I like some of Ed's knives, can't afford 'em, but I've found my niche appeal to be more in line with that Burke SanMai... and Ed has made one or two like that... but they were usually gone before I ever saw them... Otherwise, both Ed and Bill have come across to me as graciously and curteously as just about any other maker I've dealt with... It all just depends on what floats one's boat, I guess...
 
Back
Top