So by definition, the zip tie through the Spydie hole trick is patent infringement?? Not trying to be snarky, don't really know much about patent laws
That's why there are hordes of patent lawyers making a decent living litigating whether something as small as a change in the radius angle of Exhibit A is sufficient to meaningfully distinguish it from Exhibit B. In all probability, a zip tie through a Spydie hole is sufficiently different in that it projects in a different direction from a Wave Shaped Opener[SUP]®[/SUP] and is not integral or permanently affixed to the blade. And to be honest, trademarks and patents do encourage innovation-- a prospective user of a patented or trademarked innovation has to come up with something better.