DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY.
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION,
HQ W116730
November 7, 2006
RES–2–23 RR:BSTC:CCI W116730 GOB
CATEGORY: Restricted Merchandise
MATTHEW K. NAKACHI, ESQ.
SANDLER, TRAVIS & ROSENBERG AND GLAD & FERGUSON, P.C.
One Sutter Street 10th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
RE: Knives; Switchblade Knives; 15 U.S.C. §§ 1241–1245; 19 CFR
§§ 12.95–12.97
DEAR MR. NAKACHI:
This letter is in reply to your letter of May 31, 2006 on behalf of Columbia
River Knife and Tool (‘‘CRKT’’

, requesting a ruling with respect to the ad-
missibility of certain knives described below. Your ruling request was trans-
ferred to this branch for response on October 11, 2006. Our ruling is set
forth below.
FACTS:
You describe the knives as follows:
The Outburst mechanism operates via a slight spring action, which as-
sists in the opening of the knife by application of the finger or thumb
pressure on a thumb stud or disc which protrudes from the side of the
blade, allowing the blade to be more easily pushed to an open and
locked position. The interior of the blade is engineered such that the
spring actually provides resistance, which prevents the knife from open-
ing, until the blade is opened to approximately a 30-degree angle.
Hence, when incorporated into knives, the Outburst mechanism only
assists in the opening of the knife when the blade is opened to approxi-
mately 30-degrees. The user is unable to modify this restriction since at
angles less than 30-degrees, the spring exerts back-pressure which
holds the blade closed. . . . This back-pressure arises from the engineer-
ing of the tempered blade shape and not from the mere tightening of a
blade screw.
Since the Outburst mechanism holds the blade closed, it renders the
tightness of the blade screw irrelevant for purposes of review under
the Switchblade Knife Act. . . . As a secondary level of protection, even if
the main spring of the Outburst mechanism is removed, the locking arm
of the knife itself contains a ball-detent bias against the blade which
prevents the knife from being flicked open by inertia or gravity. The
ball-detent bias is also not readily accessible to modification by the user.
The knife models subject to this ruling are as follows:
1. The Koji Hara Ichi consists of a drop-point, pen-knife blade, in black
or silver. The body of the knife is built on an open frame with Zytel
scale inserts and fasteners and a removable clip. . . .
2. The My Tighe consists of a stainless-steel, utilitarian blade with op-
tional serrations. The knife includes black Zytel inserts, black hard-
ware and a black Teflon-plated, removable clip. . . .
3. The Kommer Full Throttle consists of a stainless-steel, straight blade
with optional serrations. The knife is built on an open frame with a
flat handle profile. . . .
All of the blades are readily identifiable as being designed for personal,
utilitarian use. . . .
. . .
. . . Such single-handed opening is greatly beneficial to craftsmen,
outdoorsmen and workers, who are engaged in a particular task when
the need to simultaneously make a cut arises. For example, a fisherman
could be holding a fish caught on a fishing line with one hand, while
both drawing and opening an Outburst assisted-opening knife with the
other hand.
[All emphasis in original.]
You have submitted samples of the following knives, as identified on their
packages: 1080 Full Throttle; 1081 Full Throttle; 1070 Ichi; 1070KSC Ichi;
1070R Red Ichi Asist.; 1090 My Tighe; 1091 My Tighe; and 1091K My Tighe
Black. It is these eight knives which are the subject of this ruling. In the
closed position, these knives range in length from four and one-half inches to
three and one-quarter inches. The blades range in length from three and
one-half inches to two and three-eighths inches.
ISSUE:
Whether the subject knives are prohibited entry into the United States pur-
suant to the Switchblade Knife Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1241–1245.
We have carefully examined the eight knives which you have submitted.
These knives are substantially similar in operation to the knives in HQ
116315. We find that the subject knives are not switchblade knives within
the meaning of 19 CFR § 12.96(a)(1) in that the blades do not open auto-
matically by hand pressure applied to a button or device in the handle of the
knife (there is no opening device on the handle), nor do the knives open au-
tomatically by operation of inertia or gravity. We further find that the knives
have a blade style designed for a primary utilitarian use within the meaning
of 19 CFR § 12.95(c).
[legal junk removed, basically they copied the federal law in here]
Based upon these findings, we conclude that the requirements of 19 CFR
12.96(a) are satisfied, i.e., the subject knives have a blade style designed for
a primary utilitarian use as defined in 19 CFR 12.95(c) and they are not
switchblades within the meaning of 19 CFR 12.95(a)(1). Therefore, pursuant
to 19 CFR 12.96(a), the subject knives (1080 Full Throttle; 1081 Full
Throttle; 1070 Ichi; 1070KSC Ichi; 1070R Red Ichi Asist.; 1090 My Tighe;
This is attachment "B" of what is being overturned.
The bottom of this is interesting:
REVOCATION OF A RULING LETTER AND REVOCATION
OF TREATMENT RELATING TO THE TARIFF
CLASSIFICATION OF WALL BANNERS AND PENNANTS
AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection; Department
of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of revocation of a tariff classification ruling letter
and revocation of treatment relating to the classification of wall ban-
ners and pennants
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 625(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as by
section 623 of Title VI (Customs Modernization) of the North Ameri-
can Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103–182,
107 Stat. 2057), this notice advises interested parties that Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) is revoking a ruling letter relating to
the tariff classification of certain wall banners and pennants, under
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated
(HTSUSA). CBP is also revoking any treatment previously accorded
by it to substantially identical transactions. Notice of the proposed
revocation was published on March 19, 2009, in the Customs Bulle-
tin, Volume 43, Number 12. No comments were received in response
to the proposed revocation.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This action is effective for merchandise en-
tered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after July
21, 2009.