Fixed blades

I immediately thought the same thing, and agree.


...but, no Maker's Mark (*which I know that Bill's not always consistent with location), and I've never seen one of his "Just Right" bolos executed in that fashion.
It's indeed a siegle. His stamp is on the other side. Looks to be about ¼" and I'm assuming 5160. It's an older one, maybe that's why it looks a little different. Out of curiosity I checked my email and turns out I've owned it for just over 10 years now. Been more than pleased with it.
 
It's indeed a siegle. His stamp is on the other side. Looks to be about ¼" and I'm assuming 5160. It's an older one, maybe that's why it looks a little different. Out of curiosity I checked my email and turns out I've owned it for just over 10 years now. Been more than pleased with it.


Yeah, it had "Siegle" written ALL OVER it. (*or not, in this case)

The lack of a Maker's Mark kinda' threw me a bit.



*Awesome bolo, BTW. ❤️
 
Stamping a batch prior to heat treat:

p5HlTYi.jpg


NgxS4K5.jpg


B1JAlq0.jpg


More to do. These still need their "cowboy surface grinding" before being marked for the stamp:

sNHeQ6g.jpg


Now marked:

87rUKX5.jpg


And finished! 103 blades stamped and just about ready for heat treat:

66CRTFK.jpg


AEB-L at 62-63RC is our target.
 
Rick, sorry for the delay.


In my humble opinion, the 120 doesn't compare to the 107, and vice versa. The blade stock on the 120 comes-in just under 3/16ths of an inch. The 107 is true to its 1/4-inch specs. The 120 has Buck's quintessential hollow grind, while the 107 has a deep saber grind. Both feel blocky in the hand: the 120 because of crazy-thick scales and a damn-near complete lack of any kinda' handle contouring, and the 107 because of a bit of a wonky handle design. In terms of weight, the 107 feels heftier in the hand, but not by as much as someone might presume. I think both knives will easily handle just about any reasonable "camp" task you throw at 'em. The Buck will come out on top with some, while the 107 will dominate others.

As far as what you're "missing"? I really can't answer that. I actually hate recommending anything to anyone: restaurants, vehicles, guns, knives, etc. We're all so very different that it would be inevitable that many folks would not like something that I truly love. It's interesting, however, that you mentioned the TBT-1. There were many factors (*another story for another time) that led to me acquiring my first 107, but one of them was that I wanted the reliability and durability of my TBT-1, just in a more "conventional" design.


I know that I'm longwinded, but wanted to mention a couple other things...

-I wear medium sized gloves, and my fingers are absolutely built in my image: short, fat, and pear-shaped. Over the years, I've been able to adapt to the handle on the 107 and actually quite like it, now. However, no matter how much I use it, I just can't seem to get used to the handle on the 120. I keep thinking that I may have one of the Makers here give it a little contouring, and probably will at some point.

-Whatever the grind angle is on the 107, it has some kind of "black magic"/"Jedi Knight" mojo when it comes to batoning. I own a sh!+load of knives and have never found another that batons like the Steel Eagles. Like 'em or hate 'em, many of the YouTube knife guys have felt compelled to mention the same thing, from Aaron at "Gideon's Tactical", to the "DBK" guys, to Christian at "Preparedmind101". I think C.J. Buck tried to harness some of that magic with the 108 "Compadre" Froe. And, while he got really close, he still didn't hit the mark.

-I've spent years purchasing blades that looked very similar "on paper" to the 107. (*physical specs) Every. Single. One. of them has handled and performed differently, not only in comparison to the 107 but also in comparison to one-another. For me, I guess the Steel Eagles just have some kinda' spell over me.


Anyhow, my apologies for the long post. Happy hunting.



The 120 "Frontiersman" and 107E "Steel Eagle"...





All similar, all different...


Thats a buck 124, not a 120 “the general”
Easy mistake to make.

I prefer the 119 or 120 to the 124. I tried to love the 124 and conceptually it should be a favorite but i much prefer my 119. Same blade length and less bulky. The 124 handle is also kind of obnoxious.
 
Thats a buck 124, not a 120 “the general”
Easy mistake to make.

I prefer the 119 or 120 to the 124. I tried to love the 124 and conceptually it should be a favorite but i much prefer my 119. Same blade length and less bulky. The 124 handle is also kind of obnoxious.
I don’t mind the blocky handle on the 124, better to be too big than too small. You can always remove material. The older 124’s are more svelte. I thought I would have a preference but I like them all.
 
Card says clip point - looks like a drop point to me. I'd get in touch with their warranty department. 😀

I just wanted to make sure I'm not the only one confused by this 😅 I bought it based on the pictures, and thought it was strange that the card was wrong...
 
  • Like
Reactions: TC
Oh definitely, my left hand gets pretty chewed up by flakes. Have to dig shards out pretty frequently too. I should probably wear a glove or something, but it cuts down on my ability to feel what I'm doing.

It sure does. My edged tool hobbies make me worry about what would happen if my kitchen were ever sprayed with luminol. 🤣

They .make cut resistant tape your can use that works well.......Forget the name though🤔.......but its thin and your keep your dexterity and feeling....
 
They .make cut resistant tape your can use that works well.......Forget the name though🤔.......but its thin and your keep your dexterity and feeling....
I'll have to look into it. Big knap in coming up at the Letchworth stone tool show. I even took a day off from both jobs for that. Not needing to plug a leak might just be the advantage I need in the speed knapping competition.
 
Thanks. I didn't finish last this past year, so I was happy. Especially given that I was up against some of the best in the area and a German fella by the name of Marquardt Lund, another big name in the experimental archeology field. He was there as a guest speaker, and is a phenomenal knapper.

Its a cool deal!!! All aspects are interesting to me...From the different materials, chert, flint, obsidian etc to the process and the history and evolution of the craft.......Looking forward to watching you GROW...😉.......👍
 
Back
Top