- Joined
- Oct 18, 2001
- Messages
- 20,978
machineage - I have been brewing an idea in my mind for a while now on how to lock the 2 pieces together like a puzzle - interlock, really - so that there is no possiblity of rotational movement (in line with the arc the blade makes as it opens). Such things do exist in the world of tools, fixtures, etc. So, it should be possible to make something such that when it is fully opened it sets in place, interlocks (vs. 2 parallel surfaces aligning) and then that junction is laterally braced. I think if it's protected from rotational movement as well as laterally protected from disengaging - you'd have the perfect locking system for knives.
The problem is this - how many knifemakers/inventors do you think have already been down this road already? at least in their minds, if not their pockets. And even if I were to invent such a system it would require a lot of tooling setup costs, R&D time...as well as patents, lawyers to protect it and license it, and so on.
Early on in my knifemaking career I had the opportunity to meet with a lot of makers in-person to talk ideas, etc. A few of those were the "innovators" of their time. Nearly all of those innovators has suffered from feeling like they were "robbed" at one point. Either by someone else getting the credit for their idea...or not getting the patent soon enough...or they make the same thing as "Mr. X" but he has 10 times the orders....etc. To me, that's a miserable way to live and I don't want to fall prey to it. So, I'll just wait around until someone else invents it (that's willing to put up with all the intangibles) and then I'll gladly license it from them.
Until then, I've done a lot of research - both personally as well as through other owners/sources. And the best lock on the market to go with from a custom knifemaker's view is the frame-lock. The one downside to the frame-lock is defeating the lock by torquing the bar out of place by too much rotational pressure on the spine of the blade.
My solution for this is to use full-frame handles held solidly against it so that the lock bar has nowhere to go. You get the advantage of a liner-lock, with the stiffness, thickness and lightness of a titanium frame.
The 2nd part will be using a recession in blade tang for the stop pin to slide into. With proper fit-up of this locking system, we should be good to go. :thumbup:
Dan
The problem is this - how many knifemakers/inventors do you think have already been down this road already? at least in their minds, if not their pockets. And even if I were to invent such a system it would require a lot of tooling setup costs, R&D time...as well as patents, lawyers to protect it and license it, and so on.
Early on in my knifemaking career I had the opportunity to meet with a lot of makers in-person to talk ideas, etc. A few of those were the "innovators" of their time. Nearly all of those innovators has suffered from feeling like they were "robbed" at one point. Either by someone else getting the credit for their idea...or not getting the patent soon enough...or they make the same thing as "Mr. X" but he has 10 times the orders....etc. To me, that's a miserable way to live and I don't want to fall prey to it. So, I'll just wait around until someone else invents it (that's willing to put up with all the intangibles) and then I'll gladly license it from them.

Until then, I've done a lot of research - both personally as well as through other owners/sources. And the best lock on the market to go with from a custom knifemaker's view is the frame-lock. The one downside to the frame-lock is defeating the lock by torquing the bar out of place by too much rotational pressure on the spine of the blade.
My solution for this is to use full-frame handles held solidly against it so that the lock bar has nowhere to go. You get the advantage of a liner-lock, with the stiffness, thickness and lightness of a titanium frame.
The 2nd part will be using a recession in blade tang for the stop pin to slide into. With proper fit-up of this locking system, we should be good to go. :thumbup:
Dan