- Joined
- Oct 28, 2006
- Messages
- 13,363
This was a subject that came up in conversation several times at the Blade Show.
The underlying question was, do collectors even consider a maker’s full-time/part-time status when contemplating a purchase? My initial response was “NO”, as it’s more about the particular knife being considered and the price of that knife.
Here are some of my thoughts on the subject.
First, I do not equate knife quality with full/part-time status. I do however believe a maker who has the luxury of only making 10-12 knives a year has an opportunity to perhaps produce a better knife than a maker with similar skills that has to make 40-60 knives per to support his family. There’s probably a lot to be said for a part-time or hobbyist maker that can make knives when the urge hits him over the maker who has to crank out knives to put food on the table.
• Is it true that part-time makers should be able to offer like knives at a lower cost than full-time makers? And if so do they generally?
• Are full-time/part-time designations just ambiguous labels meaning little to collectors? We all know part-timers that do excellent work and still fine the time to promote and do the “other things” that move the industry forward. I will mention Lin Rhea as a part-time maker who I consider an Ambassador for the custom knife industry.
• How many full-time makers are there? I constantly hear numbers tossed around that I consider low. But again, as an industry we have very little documented statistics, so it’s very easy for folks to throw numbers around as fact. I would like to see the CKCA start collecting and documenting some hard facts and statistics on our industry.
I truly believe that full-time makers are extremely important to the future of the Custom Knife industry.
OK, more than enough of my rambling.
I’m very interested in what collectors, makers and dealers have to say on this subject.
As aways, I thank you in advance for your participation.
The underlying question was, do collectors even consider a maker’s full-time/part-time status when contemplating a purchase? My initial response was “NO”, as it’s more about the particular knife being considered and the price of that knife.
Here are some of my thoughts on the subject.
First, I do not equate knife quality with full/part-time status. I do however believe a maker who has the luxury of only making 10-12 knives a year has an opportunity to perhaps produce a better knife than a maker with similar skills that has to make 40-60 knives per to support his family. There’s probably a lot to be said for a part-time or hobbyist maker that can make knives when the urge hits him over the maker who has to crank out knives to put food on the table.
• Is it true that part-time makers should be able to offer like knives at a lower cost than full-time makers? And if so do they generally?
• Are full-time/part-time designations just ambiguous labels meaning little to collectors? We all know part-timers that do excellent work and still fine the time to promote and do the “other things” that move the industry forward. I will mention Lin Rhea as a part-time maker who I consider an Ambassador for the custom knife industry.
• How many full-time makers are there? I constantly hear numbers tossed around that I consider low. But again, as an industry we have very little documented statistics, so it’s very easy for folks to throw numbers around as fact. I would like to see the CKCA start collecting and documenting some hard facts and statistics on our industry.
I truly believe that full-time makers are extremely important to the future of the Custom Knife industry.
OK, more than enough of my rambling.
I’m very interested in what collectors, makers and dealers have to say on this subject.
As aways, I thank you in advance for your participation.