Fun on the way home last night

Gollnick,

If Kris sues, then he's doing the exact same thing that all those Oprah-watching, poodle-walking, blouse-wearing, Prozac-packing whiners would do. A lawsuit would be the kind of reaction we'd expect from the anti-freedom, anti-responsibility crowd that started this whole hysteria.

The underlying theme here is respect and responsibility. Hiring some sleazy lawyer to whine on your behalf and squeeze another $100,000 out of the county's wallet would be an insult to your neighbors and everyone else that paid those taxes.

File the complaint, and if your wish is to raise public awareness about police misconduct, then write an editorial in your local paper.

-Wulf
 
Originally posted by kwheeler:

Frank,

FYI, the officer had no idea I had any knives on me until he started searching me, after he had the cuffs on me.

Kris



Oh, I thought you said you had six knives on you with the handgun.

 
I have always thought that the civil courts were used too often.
However, there are time when someones rights are trampled upon. When this happens we are allowed to seek redress by several means. The civil court system is one of those means.
The actions taken by this officer are similar to the same actions that King George and his men were guilty of.
The search was also illegal, no warrant. I know that warrantless searchs have become common, but that doesn't mean there right.
Just in case anyone is wondering about my politics, I am a libertarian.


------------------
Joshua, aka Feneris,'Destroyer of Whisky' of the Terrible Ironic Horde
But doom'd and devoted by vassal and lord.
MacGregor has still both his heart and his sword!
-MacGregor's Gathering, Sir Walter Scott
 
I'm with Don on this one. If the cop cuffs you,it's an arrest. He better have a damn good reason and start reading your miranda.
The cops have a tough as hell job, but they just can't go around cuffing people with impunity.
"hey, you! I don't like the way you look. Up against the wall. Spread 'em!!!"
He showed him his CCW with his license and the cop flipped. That was uncalled for.
Very simple really.
The police are supposed to protect and serve the people. That doesn't mean they can hand cuff us for our own "safety".
Something has got to happen or the meaning of the word freedom will no longer exist in the american vocabulary. Most of these gunlaws are un-constitutional anyways. I could be wrong, but doesn't the Constitution say that it can not be violated by legislation?

------------------
Regards
Joshua "Kage" Calvert

"Move like Water, strike like Thunder..."
 
Endura D.,

"Rant?" Hmmm...I "abused" you? I find it interesting that you find that to be abuse to your person, however, perfectly O.K. to handcuff a man, "for his own safety" (HARDY HAR HAR...a unique Law Enforcement euphemism for restraining him).

I have to rush out and get the new Peerless Safety Device for my Medic Bag now.

"For your own safety, I am going to handcuff you, because I have to remove your wallet...as you know, sometimes when people reach for their wallet when confronted by Police...bad things happen."

All of my Posts have been deleted or changed, scroll up and read the one on this page from early this morning. Totally different flavor so those that are easily offended...won't be.

Happy Independence Day.

Remember our conversation in Atlanta Josh?



[This message has been edited by Don Rearic (edited 07-04-2000).]
 
Don..... As I sat here reading the opinions and rebutals of these post I too thought,
confused.gif
"Geeeee, Endura Duck feels abused and mistreated simply because his OPINION was rebuffed. I'd like to see his reaction if he was cuffed and stuffed for NO LAWFUL REASON....."

Then I read your reply..... Don't you just want to laugh out loud when people make your point and don't even have a clue they did it??

Gee Duck, your a mystery, wrapped in an enigma.

Quote
"Well I run the risk of another written rant of abuse by Mr.Rearic."
Endquote

Bwaahahahaha Good one Endura Duck... No really.... Hahahahaha your killin' me. I guess everyone's entitled to their opinion as long as it doesn't oppose your's ... Hahhahahahehhehehahahahhahaohohohoh what a comedian. You actually had me believing you there for awhile.

 
Originally posted by Endura Duck:

In my uneducated opinion I would say being handcuffed is being detained and not arrested.You are under arrest when you are read your miranda rights.

Endura,
You seem to be using faulty logic when you suggest that a person is not under arrest until read their Miranda rights. Arrest is a physical state, not related to rights advisement. The definition of arrest is "the taking of a person into custody" and the definition of custody is "the restraint of free movement". It would be prudent for the officer to read the suspect his rights at the time of arrest, however, to my knowledge, it is not required. After the Miranda is read, any statements the suspect makes are admissable in court.

Joshua (and Kris),
There are some cases when a warrant is not required to conduct a 'lawful' search. I will give an overview of my understanding of the two that apply to this situation. I cannot verify that my interpretion is 100 percent correct, so verify with an attorney.

1. Lawful stop-When the lawful stop is performed, the individual stopped may FRISKED for weapons when the individual is reasonably believed to be armed and presently dangerous. Additionally, the individual stopped may have his vehicle searched in the immediate area where he was seated for weapons or contraband. There has been some contention over the term 'immediate'.

2. Incident to arrest-Same as above except the suspect is arrested, normally handcuffed and a more complete search is conducted on the individual and the passenger compartment of the vehicle.

Kris,
I agree with others who have stated that you were essentially arrested (controlled in the same manner), while the officer searched for incriminating evidence. File the complaint.

I have a lot of respect for the job that LEOs must perform, but I trust them no more than anyone else (read: zero). Knowing your remaining rights (priveleges) is key to surviving in the authoritarian state.

------------------
But when the law, by means of its necessary agent, force, imposes upon men a regulation of labor, a method or a subject of education, a religious faith or creed---then the law is no longer negative; it acts positively upon the people. It substitutes the will of the legislator for their own wills; the initiative of the legislator for their own initiatives. When this happens, the people no longer need to discuss, to compare, to plan ahead; the law does all this for them. Intelligence becomes a useless prop for the people; they cease to be men; they lose their personality, their liberty, their property. -Frederick Bastiat
 
Maxon:

"Geeeee, Endura Duck feels abused and mistreated simply because his OPINION was rebuffed.

I dont mind anyone saying my opinion is wrong.Thats why its called a opinion..I do mind when a person labels me and my views as being BULLSH*T,PARANOID OR ELITEST

Im not some friggin Nazi..

Bwaahahahaha Good one Endura Duck... No really.... Hahahahaha your killin' me. I guess everyone's entitled to their opinion as long as it doesn't oppose your's ... Hahhahahahehhehehahahahhahaohohohoh what a comedian. You actually had me believing you there for awhile.


QUACK

This will be my last post in this thread..Only seems to be making ill feelings and that wasent the intention of my posts.Be safe..Happy 4th


[This message has been edited by Endura Duck (edited 07-05-2000).]
 
The lawful stop searchs are some of the most unconstitutional.
Did you know that the Supreme Court reject 'stop and frisk' searchs last May?
I also seem to remember the Court saying that an officer can not search a car unless evidence was in plain sight, unless the officer had a warrant. I'll have to look that one up, though

------------------
Joshua, aka Feneris,'Destroyer of Whisky' of the Terrible Ironic Horde
But doom'd and devoted by vassal and lord.
MacGregor has still both his heart and his sword!
-MacGregor's Gathering, Sir Walter Scott
 
There are three basic factions in this Thread.

#1 The LEO Element that are arguing for their safety.

#2 The Citizen Element that are willing to endure whatever roadside, slanderous humiliation in order to feel for and understand the plight of a man who has a Batman Utility Belt full of communications equipment and weapons with which to defend themselves...

#3 The Citizen Element that refuse to be lied to with silliness like, "I have to handcuff you for your own, personal safety."

I want any LEO that has responded in this Thread to tell us all, precisely what calamity you are defending us against by handcuffing us?

Endura, you appear to be in Group #2 and if that is the way you feel, fine. I do not want to be handcuffed in public in view of people I know or may know in the future because some guy is scared of doing a job he is hired to do with the lame excuse it is for my own safety! You wonder why I call B.S. to that? Really? I do not want to be handcuffed for no reason, other than a blatant lie perpetrated by a LEO and when you tell me that I am being handcuffed without reading my rights, arresting me or telling me what I am being arrested for, it is B.S., and if you support it, you are supporting B.S. If you tell me I am being handcuffed, restrained and yes, arrested for my own safety, I have to ask myself, what are you protecting me from? Why lie about it? What they are telling you is this, without saying this precisely...

"If you do not allow me to arrest you and you move the wrong way, I am going to spray, beat or shoot you."

Now I ask you as an intelligent adult, what else am I supposed to decipher from a LEO who tells me he wants to handcuff me, "for my own safety?" Use your head Man. Come'on. Do they now have vaccines in handcuffs? Is he trying to protect me from disease or what? What has that go to do with MY SAFETY? Unless you are acting like a complete fool and you are punching yourself in YOUR OWN FACE and the LEO is going to take you in for a Psych Evaluation, there is no need to handcuff me for my own safety. It is a lie. That is why I consider it to be B.S., maybe you don't care what your neighbors, spouse or children think about you standing on the side of a road being cuffed because you got stopped, I do. It is offensive to me and a picture speaks a thousand words My Friend. Even if the picture is not accurate.

The Paranoia and Elitism come in with LEO's.

Would they treat an Officer from the next Jurisdiction over that way? 99.99% of the time, no. How about 2, 3, maybe 4 or 5 Counties over? No. Even though the same threat is present. Had you read carefully, you would have realized that the paranoia and elitism comment was not pointed at you.

This whole idea that is presented that people that do not want to be handcuffed under B.S. circumstances, that this is somehow some form of extremism is B.S. That is what I was talking about.

Point after point has been made by so many Forumites in this Thread. "If I am scared of someone in line at the movies, I don't have a right to cuff them..." That right there speaks volumes. This is elitism. Just because they have a badge does not give them the right to physically restrain people after they were presented voluntarily with a CCW/CHL. The person was upfront with the Officer and you do not seem to grasp that. Maybe KWheeler will be next time, maybe he will just remain quiet and I cannot and will not speak for him. But if LEO's are going to humiliate people for no reason, and being handcuffed is a form of humiliation when it is not necessary, than LEO's are going to create the "Us Vs. Them" attitude they so often complain about.

I'm sorry if this seems like it is Anti-LEO, it is not. And if it is portrayed as such, I will not bow down to it and be squelched because it is an unpopular opinion.

If an officer told me he was going to handcuff me for my own safety, the first thing I know from that statement is, he is a. Lying to me. or, b. He is terrified and I should be in fear for my life.

No one will come out and say the truth in this Thread.
 
I'm coming in late here, but I can't seem to get past Duck's statement:
"I used to get alot of questions/complaints for people at my former job when I would handcuff young,old or nonviolent shoplifters.My answer was " I dont give a Sh** if it's lil orphan Annie..the bit** is gonna wear steel".

I dont' even know where to begin on how arrogant, self-serving, self-absorbed, presumptuous, undignifying, violating, and just plaon wrong such a statement is. I certainly hope that he really doesn't mean such a thing, or walk around with such an attitude in public. I find such a statement incredibly offensive. This is exactly why "police brutality", and the polar opposite "us-vs.-them" mentality is so prevalent. Especially when, if I read the statement correctly, he was a security guard, the ubiquitous rent-a-cop, tasked mainly with the well-being of property.

Am I the only one who has a problem with this sort of display of attitude?


------------------
Don LeHue

Rome did not create a great empire by having meetings...they did it by killing all those who opposed them.
 
No, DonL, you're not alone in being totally dismayed by Endura Duck's attitude.
eek.gif
But note that he said, "in his former job . . . " It is certainly easy to understand why he refers to a "former job" . . . odds are that attitude resulted in the need to look for another job. I know it would if the employer were anywhere close to reasonable and concerned about public opinion. At least, it seems that way to me . . . YMMV.

------------------
- - - - - -

ralph
 
Yeah, Don...I remember what we talked about in Atlanta...
Ok, I wanna tell you guys something.
I'm from Denmark, Scandinavia and I've lived in the kind of country that the US is turning into. Handguns are almost impossible to aquire, especially pistols. You have to be a member of a gunclub for atleast two years and have an impeccable arrest record. And then you have to apply for the gun license and hope they haven't already reached the quota. See, in Denmark, there is only allowed a certain number of handguns. I think the number is close to 1000 handgun licenses in the country at any one time. Nobody gets a handgun without a license except the criminals. All firearms are registered up the kazoo. NO concealed carry licenses whatsoever! None, nada, ZIP!
Knives are restricted to people over 18 years of age. No knife with a blade longer than just below 3 inches may be carried on your person, unless you use it in a job function, is going fishing or hunting.
In other words, you better be able to prove that you use that folder at work or be carrying your fishing rod. No one-hand opening folders are allowed...At all. The folders you can get are all sold without the Thumbstud, disc or in the case of Spyderco's...Well forget about the Spyderco folders..You can't even get those in Denmark anymore. They started out with ordering that the Spyder holes should be filled with a brass plug...No problem, you can just drill it out if you want to...Then they got rabid and ordered that all Spyderco's should have their holes grinded away.
You gasp, but all those folders were mutilated. One-hand opening folders are considered to be on a par with switchblades.
I carried one anyways
smile.gif

If you defend yourself on the street and you break the guys arm or something equally brutal, you might as well be prepared to be indicted by the cops for assault. If you use a knife against somebody you're going to jail. Simple as that.
It doesn't matter that the guy had 4 friends that were trying to kick your skull in. If you use a knife in a selfdefense situation, you're screwed. Hell, any kind of weapon use, can get you in trouble. no matter that it was selfdefense.
They got us pretty locked in..You wanna know how much Danish citizens pay in taxes?
The average person pays close to 70 % taxes.
And we don't even make that much more money than the average American. Sure we have socialized medical care, that works ok...But the last 10 years, the government has been steadily shutting down hospitals and raising our taxes at the same time. Now?
Well, now they started closing down Retirement Homes. Military has suffered massive cutbacks...All the municipalites complain about not having enough money...Where is all our tax money going you ask?
Straight down the pockets of our politicians.
In the last year they have given themselves two pay raises. The combined pay raises have given them approximately twice what they used to get. Average pay for a politician in our government...About 200000 dollars... The higher ranking politicians get even more.
Plus, they don't pay half the taxes that the average joe does.
You like what I am describing??? You wanna live in a country like that??
No? Well then get off your ass and do something about. Cause if we just sit back and watch that is what will happen...
Enjoy your future, fella's...

"This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!"
Adolph Hitler
September, 1935



------------------
Regards
Joshua "Kage" Calvert

"Move like Water, strike like Thunder..."
 
DonL:
"I used to get alot of questions/complaints for people at my former job when I would handcuff young,old or nonviolent shoplifters.My answer was " I dont give a Sh** if it's lil orphan Annie..the bit** is gonna wear steel".
I dont' even know where to begin on how arrogant, self-serving, self-absorbed, presumptuous, undignifying, violating, and just plaon wrong such a statement is. I certainly hope that he really doesn't mean such a thing, or walk around with such an attitude in public.
First of all I must say I am Duck's wife and you people are ragging on him for his beliefs - He does not walk around in the public with that attitude - It was at his work and with shoplifters and he had a VERY BAD situation with a shoplifter once where he could have easily have lost his life which he posted on this forum before - He fooked the guy up with his Endura and lived which as he was trying to say about the officer - it could have been the cop was just making sure things went smooth and that a "situation" wouldn't arise...
Especially when, if I read the statement correctly, he was a security guard, the ubiquitous rent-a-cop, tasked mainly with the well-being of property.
Again NO he was not a rent-a-cop nor was he anyone who was in charge of law enforcement - He was merely a worker in a store who was trusted by not only his employers but LEO as well to be responsible and trustworthy in his efforts to help them maintain the costs of the store by preventing shoplifting -

Ralphtt: you're not alone in being totally dismayed by Endura Duck's attitude. But note that he said, "in his former job . . . " It is certainly easy to understand why he refers to a "former job" . . . odds are that attitude resulted in the need to look for another job.

Again you guys know nothing about him or his life - NO He was not fired because of his attitude or behavior but he left because of safety reason for hisself and his family(me&kids) The shoplifter who was injured in that situation had his name and all his info on the police report so it was not a good idea for him to stay there - Obviously...

He is/was not stating anything personal in his posts and I read he is tired of this topic as it has been taken out of proportion and clearly people are more worried about their own words than the opinions of others -
mad.gif
This is my first post because I never had the need to post anything I usually just read everyones input but when things that are written in this forum or anywhere affect people in the "real world" the way it affected Endura I felt I should try to make or explain why his views are as such - Most shoplifters have previous arrests for the same thing or warrants out for them and when you mention LEO or jail they tend to get "violent" there have been plenty of shoplifters he has delt with numerous times and the one that was almost life taken was because he didn't handcuff the man - well I agree totally with his views and his opinions - I also am a CCW carrier or use to be and I would not have been offended or had my prideand as far as
a picture speaks a thousand words my friend. Even if the picture is not accurate.
Yes thats true in some cases but so is getting pulled over for speeding or not wearing a seatbelt - anyone can see you and yes it is embarrassing
redface.gif
BUT had you not got pulled over to start with then well... figure that out for yourself - Anyways I will probably get alot of grief as Duck has but thats still my 2 cents worth if even worth that much - Just let it go - this thread is dead and old that keeps saying the same thing over and over no matter what is said to try and rectify it - Crzyrabit out...
frown.gif



 
Joshua,

I agree that the 'lawful stop' loopholes are a perversion of the 4th Amendment. No, I had not heard of that Supreme Court decision. I must wonder how much it has effected a change though. BTW, I would appreciate more information if you can find it.

Brett
 
Some confusion about Endura Duck's comments and his wife's response follows;

If Endura was not working as a Security Guard or in Loss Prevention, why was he handcuffing shoplifters? Why was he even in possession of them if he was not working Security/L.P. at the store? This seems a little wacky to me personally.

Now to shift gears and actually defend Endura and straighten a couple more things out.

#1 Shoplifters by and large are repeat offenders. They are not the "girl next door who shoplifts something "once in awhile." At times, they go from store to store on a daily basis lifting to their heart's content. This is a fact. Endura and his wife are correct.

#2 Shoplifters that have a few (or many) arrests do in fact go ballistic when confronted with the reality that they are going to jail. Anyone that says differently either lives in an area with nice, compliant shoplifters or they do not know what they are talking about.

My Wife manages a pharmacy, I have multiple Court Notices on the refrigerator constantly, the criminals do know where you live and they are a threat. She has to go to Court for this, because the store has no L.P. in each store, so Management gets into things that in my opinion, they should not be getting into.

This is why the handcuffing "for your safety" is B.S., if my wife even grabs someone and they have nothing on them, it is false arrest, she is arresting them and she can be charged if they have dumped the goods or she was wrong. When you are handcuffed, you are most certainly arrested as far as I am concerned.

Shoplifters are violent. When you confront them, you are confronting someone who in all probability has multiple offenses and even pending charges for the same crime, they are out on bond or probation for it. My wife and I have seen this countless times.

She has been spit on, punched, clawed and kicked, as 17 bottles of Advil are falling out of the shoplifter's jacket, the shoplifter is actively fighting and screaming, "You're a racist! Quit hitting me! I did not take anything!" Meanwhile, everything they stole is falling out of the custom-made shoplifting jackets they have made with hand-sewn pockets on the inside.

So...we had a guy in Maryland about 6-7 years ago who was working for Macy's, he worked L.P. for them. He had arrested a person for shoplifting and when the Court date came, the shoplifter was waiting for him and shot him dead. So, don't pick on people that work security or even more importantly, officially or unofficially as Loss Prevention. Shoplifters are not always your nephew who did something wrong once. They are often times professionals at what they do. And the more arrests they have on their record, the more dangerous and desperate they become. Don't defend the criminals, they are what they are. One guy working at a Wal-Mart in Maryland was stabbed to death by a shoplifter in the past few years as well, BTW. Don't defend the crooks guys.

A lot of Security Guards are on power trips as well, I have worked Part Time Security at times, and quite frankly, I have met more "Former Navy SEALs" working Part Time than I care to count. A lot of them want to be police very, very badly...some good, some not so good, like every other walk of life. But man, the former Green Berets, SEAL's, Marine Recon and Delta Force Security Guards really make me want to puke. "Hey, wait a minute, you could not get a job with the State Department or something?"
mad.gif


But you see, there is a fundamental flaw in Endura's logic and that of his wife.

KWheeler was not shoplifting. He was not stealing anything.

If you get caught in Maryland with bad tags, you get pulled over and after they find out you have no record or whatever, guess what? You're walking home. You car is impounded. If the tags are out of date, same thing, no insurance, same thing. If they are stolen, you are probably going to jail as that is theft. Now, are you beginning to see a pattern? Swap tags on a vehicle, it is illegal, but most of the time, it is a far cry from stealing tags and then running them on your vehicle. Had Kwheeler stole the tags, he would have went to jail and rightly so.

So, how can you compare a common criminal, often a repeat criminal with violent tendencies when cornered...a shoplifter, with a guy that did something that he probably cannot even be arrested for!?!?!?

Worse yet, he still showed them the permit.

There is a big difference between seeing someone stealing something and affecting a lawful arrest of the person and taking them into custody, and merely offering some B.S. excuse after they produced a piece of I.D. that showed they jumped through some serious hoops to have the CCW. This is not comparing apples to oranges, this is apples and Cadillacs folks. You are comparing someone who had some poor judgement or was lazy about vehicle tags with a damned shoplifter!

So, there was good and bad in all posts. Don't defend shoplifters, they are not angels.

Josh,

I am glad you received the hint and posted, some people do not know what they are asking for in this country and they are going to be some sad, sorry folks when they get what they are indirectly asking for.

And, the LEO's have not answered as to the lie of handcuffing someone, "for their own safety." Interesting.
wink.gif
 
First off I have enjoyed reading everyone's comments but I feel that I have to reply.
I have been a police officer for almost fifteen years. In the past fifteen years I have worked for three different agencies that ranged in size from six officers to 300 officers. I have worked in cities that ranged from 3200 citizens to 125,000.
One thing I want to make perfectly clear is this. I DO NOT HANDCUFF PEOPLE FOR THEIR SAFETY I DO IT FOR MINE . I have been shot at twice and on one occasion I was stabbed three times by a woman who had been beaten badly by her husband and she was upset because I was taking him to jail. Fellow forumites I was stabbed by a crime victim who I was trying to help. Am I a paranoid person? I do not think so,but let me tell you something, I am always suspicious of everything now.
Do I handcuff everyone I come in contact with while on the job? No I don't. But I have been doing this job long enough to trust my instinct when it tells me something may be going wrong.
The state where I live does not have a concealed carry law which I feel is a shame.But not having this law makes my decsions easy when I come in contact with someone carying a concealed firearm. They get arreted and taken to jail.
Also I have placed people in handcuffs and have taken them off the person after I felt the situation had calmed down and the danger had passed.
Kwheeler if you have felt that the officer has done something wrong and acted out of line by all means file a complaint . If someone had thought I had done something wrong I would urge them to do the same thing.
I did not get into this job as a power trip. I just wanted to make a differance. I watch others sit back and complain that something ought to be done and that is all the do,complain. I work midnight shift in an area many of you would not go into during the daytime. What some of you have not seen is the other side of the story. We have only heard Kwheeler's. I am not saying he is lying or anything like that but we have not heard both sides. So do not jumpd to conclusions hear both sides before reaching a decision.


------------------
All it takes for the forces of evil to rule the world is for good men to do nothing...Edmund Burke
 
At least you are honest, which is more than I can say for some. Let me give you an example, what is the one thing you do not do to a Police Officer?

Lie. So, I expect the same in return and not to be handed, yes, B.S. that being handcuffed is for my safety, thank you.

You are not the only one who has walked in places in the middle of the night that almost no one in their right mind would walk in broad daylight.

And sadly, would you let someone slip if they were carrying a concealed handgun for a reason that was plain? What if they had a Ex Parte/Restraining Order and were actively being stalked by who ever? How about then?

It is sad that you got the stinky end of the stick from the "victim" once, but as you know, alot, most? Officers are killed during Domestic Disputes. Not a good situation to be in at all.



[This message has been edited by Don Rearic (edited 07-06-2000).]
 
Crzyrabit, while I commend you for sticking up for your husband (and your husband for holding such an undesirable job in order to support his family), please read his comment again, and please tell us, without any of the context or knowledge that you specifically have of him, without any explanation of the circumstances, without any qualifying statements at all, but strictly in the manner that he made the statement that he did, how someone couldn't be offended by what I, and apparently others, see as a rude or arrogant statement.

He made no remarks regarding any specific circumstances, particular incident details, or any background information or detail on which to place his statement in context. Therefore, taking his statement on its own merit, our perception is based on nothing but the inflammatory tone of his statement alone.

My remarks were not meant to denegrate security personnel, nor were they intended to downplay shoplifting, and it's prevailing repeat offenders (I agree completely, Don, I've also read such statistics). They were also not an attack against your husband, but in what he said and how he said it. They were made in perhaps a somewhat shocked response to what I saw as a stand alone statement that I could not let just dangle "out there" without being addressed. I hope your husband has found more peace in his new endeavors.

------------------
Don LeHue

Rome did not create a great empire by having meetings...they did it by killing all those who opposed them.
 
Back
Top