- Joined
- Mar 1, 2008
- Messages
- 4,557
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
I did a comparison of the #66 Calf Roper to several other similar sized knives for you.
RR#406 Eureka Stockman, NF#661311 Calf Roper, Tid#153213 Sheepfoot Barlow, NF#561210 Dogleg Jack, RR#441 Stag Stockman
![]()
Same order looking into the blade wells
![]()
Measurements with dial caliper: ---- Length Closed --- Width through center pins --- Height from tallest spine to backspring
RR406 Eureka Stockman ----------------- 3.448" ----------------- 0.518" --------------------------- 0.803"
NF661311 Calf Roper --------------------- 3.472 ------------------ 0.520 ---------------------------- 0.891
Tid153213 Sheepfoot Barlow ------------- 3.462 ------------------ 0.513 ---------------------------- 0.998
NF561210 Dogleg Jack -------------------- 3.511 ------------------ 0.552 ---------------------------- 0.964
RR441 Stag Stockman -------------------- 3.550 ------------------ 0.552 ---------------------------- 0.667
As you can see, the Calf Roper falls exactly middle of the pack for all three measurements. But comparing the two stockmen, the Calf Roper and the Stag RR, the Rough Rider is much slimmer in every dimension. You just need to handle several different styles to see what feels best to you. I doubt there would be any real difference in how any of these five would ride in the pocket.
I'm not familiar with the Schrade 340T, but do have some #25s at hand-- and now, a Calf Roper too(!).
Calf Roper with some of the Usual Suspects:
![]()
Bottom line: the Calf Roper is slightly slimmer than the #25 barlows throughout, and its bolstered end is most definitely slimmer than a #25 barlow's bare, flared end (ahem). A #25 Jack is slimmer at its tapered bolsters, each end, but is wider in the middle.
The overall effect is that the Calf Roper feels slimmer yet in direct comparison, due to distributing its (relative) girth over an extra .5" in length.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
As fond as I am of the #25s, I agree that they are little 'tanks,' possessing none of the serpentine elegance (and comfort, in pocket and in hand) of the #66 frame.
Speaking of which...
![]()
(Inspired by others, I carefully lowered the sheepsfoot blade to present a more comfortable handle profile when using the other blades.)
No billboard "CALF ROPER" etch on this one, just an understated "Tidioute."
![]()
![]()
![]()
Mine's a little less sub-tle than the more classically appealing ebony iterations:
![]()
![]()
Pertinux what are the lengths of the spey and sheepsfoot on that #66?
On my primitive bone Calf Roper the blade lengths are:
___________tip to bolster____tip to plunge
clip main - - - 2.52" - - - - - - 2.32"
sheepfoot - - - 1.86" - - - - - - 1.67"
spey- - - - - - 1.79" - - - - - - 1.61"
![]()
Thanks Jeff!
Nice fleet there!
That new arrival looks like Horsecut Bone I think?