You're right Mitch, that IS very much like here

I'm sorry my friend

I use and photograph my knife in public all the time, but I guess I am mainly around folks who know me

Good news on the phone camera

I was supposed to have a camera arrive on Friday, but they're now saying next Saturday
Thank you Bob

One of the reasons that the Sheffield cutlery firms, for the most part, never really mechanised, was because wages were so low. Today, there is talk of the
'Gig Economy', but that is just how the cutlery trades were run, with nominally self-employed workers buying or renting their own tools, and paying for power, and a space in a factory. They were part of what was, and still is, called the 'Liver and Draw' system, in Sheffield, where they were only paid when they delivered the knives they had made to the gaffer. Such 'piece work' does not encourage high standards, when the rates are low, as they always were, since cutlers had to work very fast to earn a crust. After WW2, with increased foreign competition, Sheffield cutlery companies sought to compete on PRICE, rather than QUALITY, buying cheaper materials, and paying their workers even less. Because of WW2 though, there was actually a shortage of labour, with many new employment opportunities opening up. Only a dull boy, with no other employment prospects, would have wanted to train as a cutlery apprentice, where he would have probably been sweeping the floor for the first two years in any case. Cutlers did not want to take on apprentices, because it 'slowed them down', and they could make fewer knives. Where apprentices were taken on, they were widely misused as cheap menial labour (though this was certainly nothing new). The training they received could be very poor, and given to them by cutlers who had been poorly trained themselves. Stan Shaw is a very rare exception. He went into the trade because he had had no formal education, and was lucky to be apprenticed to a kind, knowledgeable cutler, (Ted Osborne), who was approaching retirement. There were certainly other good cutlers, but most, in the latter days of the Sheffield cutlery industry were mediocre, and simply trying to put food on their family's table. The foremen were also underpaid, and cared more about numbers, than quality. As for the owners, their forebears may have built great firms, but they were different men, for the most part, spoiled, cossetted, and detached from the trade. They saw no reason to invest, no reason to raise wages, no reason to better their workforce in any way. When their firms went under, they blamed it all on Hong Kong or the Japanese, and they carpet-bagged what they could, while sending their workers to the dole office. Sadly, there are a lot of mediocre Sheffield pocket knives, because a lot were produced. And they still are
Beautiful shade of blue Bob, and a fine-looking knife altogether