Oldest US-made Lambsfoot or Forgery?
In the calm waters between Christmas and New Year, I enjoyed a very interesting private conversation with two of our fellow Guardians,
flatblackcapo
and
@Leslie Tomville , who had both contacted me, separately, regarding a certain knife which was listed on the bay (that's the one near the Big River
@donn ). The sale was still going on at the time, so we couldn't bring the conversation here then, but with the permission of Kevin and Leslie, I thought some of you folks might be interested in this
I was first contacted by Kevin via PM, who sent me a link to the listing of a 'Vintage Winchester Lambsfoot'. Here are the seller's pics:
Now, we've spent a lot of time looking for a US-made Lambsfoot, so this was potentially big news, but my immediate reaction was that the knife had in fact been made by Joseph Rodgers & Sons of Sheffield. I initially assumed the covers were synthetic, placing it in the 60's or 70's, but if they're horn covers, they'd be earlier, and fit better with the blade etches, so maybe 30's, like the seller described. I was still thinking of the latter period though, when Sheffield had more than one dubious visitor associated with sharp practice in the Transatlantic cutlery trade.
I had used a Rodgers catalogue as a back-ground for a pic posted just a few weeks earlier, and have a lot of Rodgers knives.
Another Rodgers knife previously owned by
@glennbad:
Here's the 'Hand Forged' etch on the 'Winchester' knife compared to the one on another Rodgers knife I own:
I know little about Winchester knives, but this really didn't look like any of their knives I'd seen before, and of course it was decidedly odd that they'd use a Lambsfoot pattern, particularly as one of these knives hadn't turned up before. I checked the 2860 pattern number, and it appeared to relate to a 3 1/4" inch Sleeveboard pattern with stag covers. Furthermore, it looked like that number had been cold-stamped on the ebay knife blade. Unfortunately, it was hard to see if the Winchester stamps had been stamped in similar fashion, though they're certainly high enough on the tangs to have been added later without disassembling the original knife.
Kevin found it strange the knife was marked 'Made in the USA', and also wondered if it was a 'parts knife'. I didn't think it was, apart from the Winchester markings, it looks exactly like a stock Rodgers pattern. While I didn't think the knife was valuable, it certainly had curiosity value, and I'd have loved a closer look at those tang-stamps.
The Winchester brand certainly has a convoluted history, and I noted that Bernard Levine said that, long after Winchester ceased to produce their own knives, their German and French distribution agents had Winchester-branded knives made up under contract for distribution within their domestic markets. Rodgers certainly did work for other cutlers, but why would a genuine Winchester agent want to put their mark on a knife, which was so obviously a Rodgers pattern, and a Lambsfoot at that. Presumably, they would have had existing Winchester patterns produced - and they'd have got the pattern number right!
I speculated on why anyone would want to fake this knife. Presumably, any Winchester collector would have spotted it immediately, as would anyone with only a passing knowledge of Sheffield knives, and apart from its interest-value as a fake, it's really a pretty ordinary knife. I wondered if the forger had originally had other plans for the knife, was practicing their technique, or thought they could get a higher price for a Winchester than a Rodgers from that period? But having Winchester stamps made up seems a lot of trouble to go to, unless this knife was simply one of many cheap knives stamped up by the same forger. Have any similar forgeries previously come to light?
While me and Kevin were speculating about the knife, and the ebay price was climing to the $84 it eventually went for, Leslie got in touch to also let me know about the 'Winchester' Lambsfoot, and I recounted my conversation with Kevin. Leslie also did some research about the German-made Winchesters, and opined that this could perhaps be the source of the knife. There was also the possibility that Rodgers paid to use the Winchester name, and made the knife on license. I doubt that though, particularly without the involvement of a third party, they were well in their decline by that point, and a short-minded, skin-flinted company, but they did have an excellent name, both in Europe and America. If Winchester's European agents commissioned the knife, why cold-stamp the pattern number - possibly it was a sample, but why is the pattern number wrong, and why is the knife not better made?
Leslie asked if I thought Joseph Rodgers would have stamped the knife with the Winchester marks, including 'Made in the USA', or if I thought that this was done after manufacture. While I believe this knife is a fake, I certainly do not discount the possibility that Sheffield cutlers were involved, fake stamps have been put on knives and razors in Sheffield for hundreds of years, and during the 1970's, when Rodgers were owned by Imperial, they assembled parts, made in the US by Camillus, and stamped the knives 'Made in England'. So, I don't think it would have been a 'moral' issue, but that still doesn't mean Rodgers were involved of course, nor even any of their out-workers. I further doubt whether anyone in Sheffield would have had the knowledge or wherewithal to start faking Winchester knives, on their own, but it's certainly the case that, even today, you can easily get tang-stamps made up inexpensively, with whatever you want on them, in Sheffield. A travelling American cutlery enthusiast of the type that used to visit Sheffield in the 70's could perhaps have accomplished it, or a British collector with some knowledge of the Winchester mark. However, why select a pattern Winchester were not associated with, and err further with a false pattern number? If these were faked in Sheffield in this way, presumably a few of them would have been made, but none seem to have turned up apart from this one. Could it be that someone had got hold of a Winchester stamp, perhaps in Europe, and just used it on whatever inexpensive knives they could find? But this knife could have been faked anywhere.
It'll be interesting to see if anyone we know ever comes across this knife, it'd be great to have a proper look at those tang-stamps. Lots of speculation, so what do you think folks? Thanks to Kevin and Leslie for bringing this knife to my attention, and for the great chat
Edit - I have to say, looking at those Winchester stamps again, I do think they look suspicious.