hancea is a SCUMBAG do not deal with him!

[gzb]

sad to see a good/honest man like RIO get trashed for no reason. That is plain wrong. He does not need it, but I have dealt with Rio and he is solid and would never throw someone under the bus for any reason. He's no bully or scum AT ALL. He's on several forums and is always a pure gentleman. It is times like this that I think a delete should be allowed, what a shame to slander someone, without knowing them. What the heck is going on .. Sorry Rio, you are solid with me.

+1 here.

Rio is good people in my book...

 

[Dferg10]

I addmit that i made a mistake,i shouldn't have sent him the funds unless i was 100% sure.
I don't really care that this guy started this thread and gave me negative feedback,it botheres me abit that he trashed my rep and probably no one will want to deal with me again.
BUT WHAT I DO REALLY CARE ABOUT IS THAT I HAD A DEAL WITH NEIL,FOR BUYING ANOTHER SHAMWARI.Well that was until this guy contacted Neil.And Neil canceled the deal,a deal that imho had nothing to do with him.
Now that is just pure hate,and is something that shouldn't have happened.
And the deal was not an international deal,i have a US address!

You still don't seem to get it. It is not that you "shouldn't have sent the funds unless [you] were 100% sure." You should not have posted "I'll take it," unless you were 100% sure. Once you said you would take it, you should have gone through with the deal. Yes, the OP over reacted and has his own hand in this mess, but you should have kept your word.

 

[KyleMS11]

Wow this is just ridiculous. The op has a right to be aggravated about him backing out on the deal after the money was already sent, but really?! A hate thread like this. And leaving negative feedback on a deal that was never completed? Thats just wrong. Both are wrong in this situation, but leaving rio negative feedback (again negative feedback when no deal took place) because you messed up and posted the wrong pictures and were to lazy to fix it. Thats just wrong. So you trash the reputation of hancea, and then try trashing rio's reputation. Out of all 3 that were involved here i would say your reputation is trashed the most, thanks to yourself. After reading this i would never do business with the op or hancea, but would not hesitate to do buisness with rio. Yea rio should have read the thread a little better, but trying to trash his rep over somthing that was 80% your fault is not right.

 

[Popsickle]

Wow this is just ridiculous. The op has a right to be aggravated about him backing out on the deal after the money was already sent, but really?! A hate thread like this. And leaving negative feedback on a deal that was never completed? Thats just wrong. Both are wrong in this situation, but leaving rio negative feedback (again negative feedback when no deal took place) because you messed up and posted the wrong pictures and were to lazy to fix it. Thats just wrong. So you trash the reputation of hancea, and then try trashing rio's reputation. Out of all 3 that were involved here i would say your reputation is trashed the most, thanks to yourself. After reading this i would never do business with the op or hancea, but would not hesitate to do buisness with rio. Yea rio should have read the thread a little better, but trying to trash his rep over somthing that was 80% your fault is not right.

The news of him doing all of this after selling the knife to the backup is troublesome as well

 

[wolfmann601]

Seems like alot of lessons have been learned as a result of this thread. Simple ones; never buy unless 100% certain and never leave retaliatory feedback.

At least I hope the lessons have been learned.

AND Rio is one of the good guys. I would deal with him anytime, his integrity and credibility is firmly intact.................

 

[RevDevil]

I'm going to close this one down. We've already said what needed to be said. There is a thread in tech support regarding the removal of the incorrectly given feedbacks. Spark will take it from there, only he can reverse negative or incorrect feedback.