- Joined
- Nov 22, 2009
- Messages
- 11,601
Indeed this is thought provoking in a way that a I have to move my sluggish mental processes.
Ok, so a knife will make a certain task easier. Let's take cutting up tomatoes as an example. I'd guess a brand new box cutter will make short work of tomatoes, but does this capability constitute "hard use"?
IMHO, no. It may excel at slicing soft material or even excel at a lot of use cutting cardboard but will the blade survive lateral pressures? Can the knife withstand stresses that say a strider can?
To be called hard use a knife must be able to survive stresses that other less heavily built knives cannot. It must survive it intact and still be able to function as a knife when used in situations where it is subjected to a lot of force. And this applies to all parts of the knife. Not just the lock or the blade or the pivot but the whole knife(folder).
Is the tomato you cut causing you to sweat and get sore muscles? Would a different knife change that? Typically I would say that cutting a tomato is not a hard use (even with my crappy definition you questioned).
The box cutter CAN survive stresses that other less heavily built knives cannot. It CAN survive a lot of force (depending on how you define "a lot"). HOW MUCH force does it need to survive? I submitt that if you are doing HARD WORK (i.e. that which requires you to put force into the handle of the knife that causes you the user to start sweating and eventually get sore muscles...we can amend that to include fatigue to the point of needing to rest, if you like) and that hard work does not result in failure of the knife...the knife is up to the task of "hard work".
Perhaps it is the way we pronounce "tomato" LOL.
Hey, it is all good, I know where you are coming from...hopefully you follow my logic. We do not have to agree entirely, and I know that the term "hard use" is not going away any time soon, and it probably will never be defined in a manner that all users and manufacturer (who use the term) can agree on.