- Joined
- Jun 5, 2012
- Messages
- 29,189
Disagreed.The vast majority of those “destruction tests” simply prove you can destroy a tool by using it outside of its design parameters.
I’m now going to do a ball peen hammer test by striking the horn of my anvil with the wooden handle of the ball peen hammer. See? It broke.
I’m going to test this 12 Gauge shotgun by filling the barrel with concrete and firing a round. See? It failed.
I’m going to test the structural integrity of this F35 Fighter by flying it into the ground at a 60 degree angle. See? It failed.
Im going to heat his crow bar until it looses its magnetism and then try and pry off the door of the safe. See? It bent. Failed.
Utterly stupid. Impractical. No bearing on the real world.
While it is possible to have a test that is as you describe, many are not what you are describing.
When does a given knife fail? How far can it bend before it takes a set? Does it bend or just snap?
That is valuable information, if you don't want to know those limits, then deny yourself the information. You are entitled to your opinion.
I suppose some people never use knives outside of their exact ability, cut pie, make wood shavings etc.. that is perfectly fine. Yay for you.
Others color outside the box, I happen to like knowing what a given item will take.
I watch phone drop tests, I like to know how durable a phone is before I get it. Is a phone meant to be dropped? No. If you never drop your phone who cares how durable it is, right?
Accidents happen, situations happen, things experience use that it may not be intended for, how does any given item perform under those circumstances? I like to know.
To each his own.
Last edited: