Have you ever seen a design without the Talon Hole?
No.... But, I think it is about time. Especially on the smaller knives. Busse has a pretty stong belief in providing "Functional" knives. The "trademark" is interferring with function.
If the Trademark is just mandatory, I tried my best to accomodate the Talon Hole in these recent modifications. I still say bringing in the blade edge is better.
From the Co. website: "This feature is a registered Trademark of the Busse Knife Company".
So. A Registered Trademark does NOT have to be used on EVERY single product. That just means no other company can use it other than Busse.
Fine .... keep it on larger choppers and some of the Combat styled blades. I can see some functional uses for it - in some occassions - although VERY rarely IMO, but at least it is not as much a detriment to certain larger knives.
I feel each knife should be analyzed and consideration taken to use or not use the Talon Hole depending on what serves the best function. In this knife in particular, the Talon hole is worthless and a detriment to this knife design.
If we have so many "Sterile" blades (no logos), why can't we drop the Talon Hole when it is best? What is the difference? The Logos are being dropped for a reason.
There is PLENTY of reason to drop the Talon Holes on MANY occassions. This is one of them.
What the heck would I hang my Dog Tag off of?
Hang it off the back hole .... or don't....
If function is not important to you, you could Duct Tape your Dog Tag anywhere to the knife you wish.

- I am just kidding..... But, my point is about function. I would rather have my knives function as best as possible for my purposes than have a "HOLE" that I don't need. This knife does NOT need a Talon Hole.
For my purposes, this is what I feel the the larger BussMuk should be like:
:thumbup:
.