- Joined
- Jul 31, 2015
- Messages
- 3,118
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
thank you sir. Did you taper on the SGA?Shucks Kevin - that looks to be about as accurate as anybody needs for knife making. Some folks say you need less than .001" for folders, but even if you had .001" difference in that total length, in a folder length it would be less than than .001", perhaps only 1/2 thou. Good job - I do like the 3" contact wheel you're using with 3" belt.
I'm "making do" with 2" wheel 'n belts which seems to be working "ok". On a 2" wide chef knife I'll do a quick hand grind on the bevel for about 4" from heel toward point for 1/4" to 1/2" up from edge. That allows the 2" belt to grind good on rest of blade, and that portion is going to be ground away during bevel grind anyway. I just did a .118" AEB-L blade, and put a taper to .042" at tip.
Kevin - an all around good job.
No. It's the blade you see in the first video, but I took it to 60, then 120. After I tightened up the cross feed table, the thing is rock solid.great results ! i wonder if accuracy would fluctuate with grit size ? that was done @ 36 grit only ?
Here's kind of a wrap up video of the whole build. It's got some information I'm sure you all know, but it's for my YT channel. Also a video showing the tolerance I'm seeing. I'm not convinced this will be typical, as it's way better than i expected, but I'm stoked regardless.
You know, I don't see why that wouldn't work. The only thing that might be an issue is if the compound table was not lined up with the axis of the contact wheel. I think you would really want that to be in line. Since you can see I had to relieve my tool arm anyway, that introduces a variable of "did I make a nice level cut?" So using a separate plate with a riser to get it lined up, probably wouldn't be any more of a variable come to think of it. Since the compound table is wider than the tooling arm already, I think I would go with a separate plate that is wide enough to accommodate it as well.Awesome videos! In the first video where you explain how to do it if your grinder doesn't turn horizontal, could you just angle the cross feed table, rather than building a separate arm?
I love it! Nice videoclips!Here's kind of a wrap up video of the whole build. It's got some information I'm sure you all know, but it's for my YT channel. Also a video showing the tolerance I'm seeing. I'm not convinced this will be typical, as it's way better than i expected, but I'm stoked regardless.
You know, I don't see why that wouldn't work. The only thing that might be an issue is if the compound table was not lined up with the axis of the contact wheel. I think you would really want that to be in line. Since you can see I had to relieve my tool arm anyway, that introduces a variable of "did I make a nice level cut?" So using a separate plate with a riser to get it lined up, probably wouldn't be any more of a variable come to think of it. Since the compound table is wider than the tooling arm already, I think I would go with a separate plate that is wide enough to accommodate it as well.
thank you sir. Did you taper on the SGA?
yes. Think about the force of the compound table and the counter force of the contact wheel/ belt. You want a point load situation where those points are pushing directly into one another. If it's not in line, you are introducing a force that is working against a cantilever (in this case, the linear rail). In my mind, that is introducing a stress, that while I can't be CERTAIN will negatively impact precision, I wouldn't want to risk it. I think using a 1/2" thick aluminum plate to mount the cross feed table on will be more than ridged enough. In fact, I considered it, but then remembered that my grinder tilts. ( I knew I built that into the grinder for a reason)I am trying to understand why the compound table needs to be lined up with the axis of the contact wheel. Maybe I am just having a hard time visualizing it and what would happen if it wasn't. Are you thinking that it should be lined up to evenly push into the contact wheel? Maybe this is why yours came out so accurate?
This is something that I NEED to make early this year. I have a KMG and just trying to figure out the attachment of the table. I like the simplicity of one tool arm.
I agree, it is totally worth it just in the belts and time saved using a welding magnet and flat platen. Thanks again for all the help via messages.I love it! Nice videoclips!
My conclusion after using it for a while now: Building this SGA gives you an amazing price-performance ratio. It's a very effective tool for a knifemaker, the more I use it the more I know I wouldn't want to be without it.
Since I have to keep my new space clean ( and divorce free) I think I'll make a chute out of a 90° 4" vent pipe fitting to detect Sparks into my bucket. They are kind of going that way anyhow. I've been thinking of making a longer, rectangular trough for the grinder, and if I make one that swivels, it will catch the Sparks even though I'm moving back and forth.If you don't have a horizontal grinder, you want to mount it like I did. Here is my video of my "first" surface grinder build.
Actually, I prefer it being at this 45 degree over horozontal. And easier to mount a can to collect the shavings. LOL! As if I do that!
Kevin, once again I love your build man. Like I told you, I may need to make another one to be as pretty as currenthill's & yours. But it works so good, the looks are secondary. And I still want to see someone else make their own cross feed adjustment table. Ken is the only one who did after I posted this.
If I had known how long it would take to get the rail, I might have. I'm no machinist though.