- Joined
- Sep 3, 2004
- Messages
- 450
No there is nothing on it. It’s the same one Jesse used I think.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
The problem is, the way I've seen these used is you take a pass, advance the table, repeat. Locking and unlocking for every pass would seem to be a real pain.To solve locking it in place I think you could fabricate a locking system on the side. Is the slot on the side like a T slot? If it is, #5 would be a locking lever. 1-4 just attach it to the sliding block.
View attachment 851916
The problem is, the way I've seen these used is you take a pass, advance the table, repeat. Locking and unlocking for every pass would seem to be a real pain.
maybe that would work if just enough pressure was applied to the locking handle to keep the table from sliding on it's own, but still allow adjustment at the crank?I totally agree, I was simply posting a solution for what was currently built.
I'm really not happy the ball screw guide rail. When grinding it has enough play in a cross twisting motion that at the end of the slide rail there is more than 1/4" play toward the belt. If I can't find a work around, I'll have to change it to something different. Very annoying!
I thought so too. The forward and back motion of the ball screw is very tight. So if you're just pushing or pulling it's ok. But not for the twist from one end of the chuck to the other. And of course if it twists sideways it has to be twisting up and down also. I've a work around in mind and will post it if it works.It would seem like a ball screw guide rail like that were supposed to hold a lot tighter tolerances.