I see a pattern here,first INFI,then SR101 and SR 7something.Why doesn`t Siegle or Ted Frizzell modify 5160 by adding 1/2% of carbon and may be 1% of plutonium and call it M5160?Why only Busse chooses this MO?
Carbon V from Cold Steel, Alchemite from Marbles, Tru-Sharp surgical steel from Case, Pumaster steel from Puma...And here just a brief search finds a thread with you wanting to buy--and recently--a knife by Puma.
Also, you express intest in buying TOPS knives, a company which uses machines to mass produce blades, is rather fond of epoxy coatings, and even makes use of a cord wrapped handle, or two or forty. Hmmm, sound an awful lot like these other companies you're now dismissing for their business practices? Or is only paying $250-300 for a knife that "only costs a few bucks to manufacture" less silly? I mean, these WTB requests of yours are within the last couple of months--long after your mysterious contacts at Blade Show apparently let you in on the real scoop. Oh and you know what? These knives are well worth owning and using, but it does seem that your criteria for what makes a knife a quality piece or a company honest change by the moment into whatever you believe will make your responses sound cute.
You say that you seldom put your knives to any use, but that you are certain your current knives would serve your uses better than your prior knives, should you ever actually use them. However, you then say that any claims of performance made here must be backed up by real use and testing. You then turn around and balk at the notion that you do this testing yourself. When supplied links to actual testing you change the subject.
You say that the composition of INFI is close to A2. Then when told it's not close to A2 you say you think it's probably A8. Then when told that this has been dismissed within the very thread that you found (but obviously didn't read) you say that it's probably 1095 or 440C, this time quoting (again) special contacts inside the knife industry who let you in on all the big secrets, but (as always) refusing to name them.
You propogate the notion that the knife industry works on deception, self-promotion, and politics, and then quote (again, namelessly) information you say you received from members of
the knife industry as being almost beyond all possibility of inaccuracy or bias.
You say that you will let a knifemaker (in this case, Bill Siegle) speak for himself, but go ahead and guess what his reasons/opinions are. Oh and by the way, I'm afraid that if you ever actually speak to Bill Siegle or Ray Laconico or John Greco--all of whom I've dealt with a bit myself over the years--about their opinions on Busse/INFI, you'll receive answers disappointing to your agenda here. This isn't me making their choices for them, you understand, but passing on admiration that they have expressed on their own. And yes, I'm actually using their names because this subject has actually come up in conversations I've actually had with them, and I'm in absolutely no danger of being called on the carpet as a liar since I'm not lying. Would you like to verify this? Direct any one of them to this thread, or we can set up a conference call... If you wonder why I don't make any mention of the opinions of Ted Frizzell (MMHW), Robert Hankins or Scott Tanguey, the subject has never come up with Robert and I've never spoken with Ted or Scott, though I understand they make fine knives.
Of course, if those above actually do admire products that you claim are garbage then they're probably just wide-eyed fools like the rest of us, right? Oh but wait--you have a great deal of respect for these crafters of handmade tools and admit that their knowledge far surpasses yours, right? Or, are they part of the dishonest, hype-driven knife industry that is putting one over on us, maybe? A clarification would be appreciated.
I am not concerned about how much either you or I can "dish out" in terms of argument of affrontery. Based upon the inconsistencies of your posts I have to believe that you are, at best, (or perhaps I should say "most innocent") truly bewildered beyond your ability to competently speak on this subject, or (at worst) just fabricating as you go along in order to keep attention on yourself. Either way, I can only wish you better days and personal growth.