It seems like batoning is the standard by which all fixed blade knives are judged by. Why is that? I use a axe or hatchet for that. It seems that a lot of knife nuts are wanna be survivalists just like many guns nut seem to be wanna be "operators".
I read the first 5 pages of this thread and didn’t see the first answer that came to my mind when I read the title. If I’m reiterating, my apologies.
But the reason, in my mind, the baton test is the standard for a fixed blade is, if the fixie can’t baton, you may be just as well off with a folder.
That’s not to say you “will be” batoning with the knife. But the knife’s ability to do so may be a level of durability you appreciate.
Personally, I don’t really care for folders. Which is funny, because if the sales threads act as any kind of gauge, the majority of folks here REALLY like folders. And I think many of the fixed blade enthusiasts on this site dabble in both arenas. Not me tho… I just like fixed blades.
And the draw of a knife can be for different purposes… self defense, every day use (ie breaking down boxes, cutting string or cordage, sliding things out that fall between cracks), or outdoor “bush” needs. But durability, edge retention, corrosive resistance… those are the standards by which I measure a knife.
I’m rambling… but I’ll end with this. My appreciation for knives is driven, in large part, by my appreciation for steel. If a knife is too delicate to baton, I probably won’t buy it…