I'll address it - We don't steal designs.
I'm new to this forum, but I can see already there is an impressive collection of CS haters here. That's a shame.
I understand that not everyone is going to love our knives, and that's down to personal preferences. That's fine. BUT, to call us thieves is just plain wrong.
You've been misinformed
I work in the same building as members of our R&D team and believe me, they don't steal designs
That's just not how we roll here at Cold Steel.
The CS Black Sable holds more than a slight resemblance to Brian Tighe's "Tighe Stick". The blade is so similar in shape that even Stevie Wonder could look at and tell you that the Black Sable is a copy of the Tighe Stick.
But the handle is a bit different, and it uses a different lock. So that makes this copy OK, right?
Well, what about the Black Talon? Looks a lot like the Spyderco Civilian/Matriarch.
But the handles are different, and you can't patent a blade curve, right?
Except that you can and Spyderco actually has/had
Spyderco actually has/had 3 patents (2 design, one utility) on the "Reverse S Curve" blade. But maybe that tiny little extra curve at the base of the Black Talon is enough for your lawyers to argue that it's a "unique" design.
And how could we leave out the GI Tanto and its...shall we say...accidental resemblence to the Strider BT?
But the CS doesn't have the thumb jimping, or those silly tiger stripes, and the butt angles the other way. So it can't be a copy, right? I mean, it's not like the description on CS's website for the knife is making a pointed dig at Strider or anything. It must be some other company ran by "convicted felons and rip off artists posing as elite 'military operators'". But not Strider, because the GI Tanto isn't a blatent rip-off of the Strider BT.
Actually, I'll let the GI Tanto slide. Not because Strider is run by felons/liars, but because the BT uses the "Americanized tanto" blade style that Cold Steel made popular themselves (even if they did "borrow" it from Bob Lum).