Torture testing needs to be meaningful. Did he test chemical resistance? Corossion resistance? No? Why not?These are very important in survival scenarios. What about electrical conductivity? Ka-Bars are great since the handles seem to be electrically insulative. Are they?
Chemical resistance? what chemicals and for what. How dangerous to humans do you wish to make this test? This is an individual not a corporation?
Corrosion resistance? That's easy 1000 series steels suck for corrosion resistance. 1095, 1050, etc will rust. You want to keep them from rusing? Ok, bring the metal to a high polish to reduce the surface grain size and then clear coat it with a thermal barrier, not an abrassion barrier. The higher the chrome content and general alloying content the higher the resistance of the metal to pitting during corrosion.
Electrical insulation? Unless specifically noted by the manufacturer that the handle resists conduction of current, do not in any way trust the material. There is only three knives to my knowledge that were designed to resist electrical conduction. Neither one of those has Noss tested nor will he be likely to ever test them.
I'd like to see a video of a knife 'accidentally' cutting a live high voltage cable.That's more realistic than a knife chopping concrete block.Or how about cutting into a plastic or steel drum? I've read of more than a few Soldiers having to do that in theater.
NO, NO ,NO, do not ever do this unless the manufacturer guaranties electrical insulative properties You are missing the point on the concrete test. It is very destructive and it speeds up the deterioration of the blade much faster to see how the edge and steel react. That is all. Not so hard to understand and I fail to see why people have such a hard time with this.
The video are great, but where is the test result data in a table with metrics?
Again, we are talking about an individual not a corporation. And he is fairly new to this. He has already improved his testing with each knife and I think he will learn from his own tests and continue to better his testing.
Look. I never disagreed with the torture aspect of the test plan, only the fact that it's administered inconsistently across the group of subjects and the torture methods are arguably unrealistic. I mean, it's possible to exert a different amount of force when smacking one blade than when smacking a competitor- hence the need for robotics labs. Why is the identity of the tester hidden? In my field, everyone that does the testing and writting is known. How else can you qualify the results as valid and impartial? So I guess what I mean is, how do we know what personal leanings the tester has if we don't know who they are?
Yes, this is a tough one. You can hit one knife 3 times harder with a hammer than another and it will fail sooner. No doubt about this. However to date the knives that failed very early on with hardly any hammering while others took it all and failed much later than expected. Also you can never say that someone didn't hammer on the knife before starting the video to make it fail sooner. There are many ways to skew testing in any industry. Having non bias witnesses is a way to solve that, but that is nearly impossible.
It's like giving student in a class a different test each! I would love to know which knife is the best carver or chopper or slicer- in a fair trial.
Would you make sure that they are all given the same edge angleso that the blades geometry is the deciding factor? This would truly make it fair. Otherwise it makes no difference as the edge angle is usually what determines how well they cut.