KingMC
The Pun-isher
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2014
- Messages
- 11,600
I took at as people basically just fanboying. I never did actually recommend any knife, just a style. I recommended against an overly large knife with a glassbreaker.
You did a lot more than 'recommended against an overly large knife with a glassbreaker', what you said was
Well the last thing Id want would be a Becker or Esee or some overly large knife made out of carbon steel with a freaking glass breaker pommel.
That's not just a recommendation, that's a personal opinion phrased like an attack on overly large carbon-steeled knives with glass-breakers. You cannot make that statement as such and then be surprised that it started a conversation, it was about as inflammatory as you could have made it.
(Just FYI, Beckers don't have glass-breakers, just because the tang sticks out past the handle scales doesn't mean it's a glass-breaker)
I didnt saw a lot of cynicism based off what I feel is marketing and photographs attempting to provide an proof for carbon steels in an outdoor environment.
Again, the pictures were not attempts to 'market' any knives, they were proof that the opinions being shared had valid experiences behind them. Once again, that's a normal part of the forums here.
I was making an argument for using stainless steel and some reasons that it could be necessary. Ive gone on a handful of multi week treks in the Rockies and Ive seen a lot. Perhaps I was taking the OPs question too seriously.
Were the rust tests a bad idea? I ask because things like that arent entirely unhelpful but I thought it was kind of implied that they are mostly just for experimentation.
Using history as an example is great but at the same time we moved on from stone, wood, bronze, iron. I was saying, take a look into some modern stainless steel knives. Im not implying carbon steel blades will rust and disintegrate. Im not implying stainless knives are immune or impervious to any kind of corrosion, just weighing options.
The way you presented your argument made it seem as you were attempting to prove a point, if you had presented it as more of a recommendation and less of a 'stainless steel is better and here's why' argument it wouldn't have become such a big discussion topic.
If you were going to limit yourself to one knife and go out into the wilderness for a long period of time IMO something 4-5 inches made out of a modern stainless like CPM S35VN or Bohler Elmax would definitely be among the best choices. Are you going to bring oil, sand paper, WD40, scotchbrite, and wipe your knife down after every use. Its not unreasonable to do so I guess but... But what Im getting at is are you going to spend a lot of time maintaining the knife in the event that weather turns? What about rain? What about humidity before and after rain? What about snow? What if my clumsy ass falls into a stream or I drop my knife into the snow or on muddy ground? I go trekking and know what to bring, a knife is actually a necessity but Im going to make sure I have a ton of other stuff as well, folding saw, multiple methods to make fire, first aid, water filtration, waterproof everything, trash bags for dirty clothes, a SPORK, a suitable cup / plate, camp suds, Nalgenes, etc, etc
The reason the Fallkniven F1 and others are VG10 is because of corrosion resistance everything about it is for surviving in a downed pilot situation wearing gloves (rubber handle) up in the arctic circle.
You can't tell me that what you were doing is recommending stainless steels here, it is clearly an attempt to present situations where high-carbon steels would seemingly suffer from the environment in an attempt to sell stainless as the best option.
I wasnt going to make a reasonable level headed post weighing this and that and explaining this and that after I felt was just being trolled with shitposting.
The first response to this thread I had typed out which I deleted was: "If I fell out of bed and into the wilderness Id hope to at least have any knife." Then I went with more cynicism. No emojis.
I read an article like a month ago about how emojis are basically necessary for not coming off insulting or argumentative.
I hope this clears the air a bit or at least explains a couple things at minimum.
It's alright to share an opinion as a recommendation on these forums, in fact it's pretty much standard practice; it's not cool to get pissy when someone comes along with a different opinion that counters your own opinion. You cannot backtrack and say none of your posts were meant as attacks when more than a few people read them as such, you can't use lack of emojis as an excuse as to why you were misunderstood when everybody understood you fine and just didn't agree with you.
You screwed up and starting an argument that didn't go well for you, that's very normal and nothing to be ashamed about. The best way to recover from it is to just suck it up and move on, trying to pile on excuses will only make it worse.
Finally, just for clarification, it's not trolling when someone replies to your posts with contrariety.