- Joined
- Apr 10, 2000
- Messages
- 3,794
No, I don't assume there are no lateral forces with the machines, but compared to humans they're a lot less pronounced.First, you are assuming that there are no lateral forces in machine tests - or that machines only exert the (much greater in magnitude) downwards force that actually does the cutting with both machine cuts and hand cuts.
Depending on the machine that is possible, but impossible for humans. Also, the difference between those two(lateral forces) is what would make the key difference.Unless all sideways motion during the cut are eliminated, there will be some lateral forces with any cut, human or machine.
Correct, however that isn't done. Also, catra and slicing in general is the easiest case. Chopping and heavy duty use is far more complicated and damaging to the edge. Which btw is the subject of the debate. It is a lot easier to make two similar slices than two similar chops, especially when you are working more than few minutes.I would guess there is some play (or you could put some play) in the linkages of a CATRA machine that result in some sideways motion of the knife, ...You could easily introduce them with a machine.
Even the lateral force is small compared to vertical force, it is applied to the very thin strip of metal, and the force applied to the edge is multiplied, where effort force is lateral force applied by human and load force will be what the edge receives, fulcrum point being wherever the blade is in the medium.Second, you also assume that this lateral force is very important in how an edge dulls during cutting, even though it is very small compared to the cutting force.
Pictures yes, a lot. Measuring lateral force is beyond my ability for now. But I can guesstimate that it is a lot less compared to vertical.My previous question was, has anyone ever done any tests or taken any pictures of edges to substantiate that this small lateral force is a major factor in the dulling of an edge from cutting?
Complete gallery - damaged edges on the kitchen(mainly) knives. That is a complete gallery, and lots of the photos are damaged by average users inthe kitchen.
Now specific ones, taken soon after cutting nothing more than vegetables on the end grain wood cutting board.
Aritsugu A-Type gyuto, ~60HRC, gokinko steel, which supposedly is similar to D3. ~150x.

Shigefusa gyuto, his proprietary "spicy steel" which is based on some Swedish steel. 64HRC. ~90x.

Sanetsu gyuto, ZDp-189 steel, 64-66HRC. ~100x.

Finally, Watanabe Nakiri, Aogami I steel, 63-65HRC.
This one doesn't have fractures, but mainly folding.

This is pretty much how all the above edges were before cutting anything. Since photos were taken to study/see the effects of cutting on the steel I didn't always keep "before" photos or take them, just an inspection with the same microscope used for those photos above.

Well, it's not that trivial, at least taking magnified pix and sharpening clean edges. Anyway, all the above was caused by vegetables, harshest of them being carrots and broccoli stems. I was pretty surpriced to see microfractures on Aritsugu, which is just 60HRC, and Watanabe held up w/o chipping at 63-65HRC, obviously the steel is very important.It would just take simple observation of edges during cutting to show it is true, so it is curious why no one has done this, despite the contention being posted here over the years many times.
Well, yes and no. if you are trying to model something that unavoidably has both, unpredictability ad unrepeatability then, why? It will give part of the picture, but not vrey realistic one.Adding any factors of unpredictability and unrepeatability to a test is something to be avoided,