Show me where 'built like a tank' and 'hard use' implies prying?
Show me where "built like a tank" and "hard use" implies "Any use of these products other than cutting is considered misuse and abuse."
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
Show me where 'built like a tank' and 'hard use' implies prying?
Show me where "built like a tank" and "hard use" implies "Any use of these products other than cutting is considered misuse and abuse."
Show me where "built like a tank" or "hard use" is defined? You can't because they aren't. They are marketing terms. There is that little bit in the warranty that states the knife is only for cutting. Have you seen that part yet?
Here's a clip from the warranty of the '#1 hard use knives in the world'
Your Emerson knife is built to withstand the rigors of extreme use, but it is a knife, not a chisel, screwdriver or hammer, and it is not intended for use as such. This knife is a cutting tool and is not designed for throwing
This is exactly what I'm getting at - it's disingenuous for a company to have a marketing scheme like this when the company themselves considers anything other than cutting to be "misuse and abuse" and won't cover you under warranty should you do anything other than cutting. Some companies don't include stuff like "hard use" in their marketing and they don't cover hard use tasks. Makes sense. Other companies market their knives as hard use, and if you break them doing hard tasks, then they will stand by their claim and cover you under warranty. Also makes sense.
Every time i read one of your posts i can feel myself getting dumber... seriously, why such a hard on for advertising language? Every company in America uses verbiage that they feel best portrays what they are trying to sell.
I have no problem with advertising language. What bugs me is when a company doesn't stand by their marketing with their warranty. That goes for any product by any company. CRK doesn't advertise their knives as hard use, so it makes sense that they wouldn't cover hard use in their warranty. Busse advertises their knives as hard use, and their policy is to replace or fix your knife if you've hard used it.
This is exactly what I'm getting at - it's disingenuous for a company to have a marketing scheme like this when the company themselves considers anything other than cutting to be "misuse and abuse" and won't cover you under warranty should you do anything other than cutting. Some companies don't include stuff like "hard use" in their marketing and they don't cover hard use tasks. Makes sense. Other companies market their knives as hard use, and if you break them doing hard tasks, then they will stand by their claim and cover you under warranty. Also makes sense.
I have no problem with advertising language. What bugs me is when a company doesn't stand by their marketing with their warranty. That goes for any product by any company. CRK doesn't advertise their knives as hard use, so it makes sense that they wouldn't cover hard use in their warranty. Busse advertises their knives as hard use, and their policy is to replace or fix your knife if you've hard used it.
You keep talking about kai not honoring their warranty but they do. And they have warrantied abused knives. But if you expect them to openly say "dont worry, be stupid, we will take care of it" then you are a bit unrealistic. companies need to protect themselves from stupidity and those seeking to take advantage. A good example are car warranties. My 2004 wrx had a warranty that specifically stated that certain abuse would not be covered. That didnt stop me from dumping the clutch at redline seeing if i could get all four wheels to break loose. My dealer fixed it for free as a one time courtesy. But it was made very clear that if i came in again with a tranny only working in reverse it would then be my problem. Companies need to protect themselves from ignorance and stupidity. But it doesnt mean they will always choose to deny you.
This is exactly what I'm getting at - it's disingenuous for a company to have a marketing scheme like this when the company themselves considers anything other than cutting to be "misuse and abuse" and won't cover you under warranty should you do anything other than cutting. Some companies don't include stuff like "hard use" in their marketing and they don't cover hard use tasks. Makes sense. Other companies market their knives as hard use, and if you break them doing hard tasks, then they will stand by their claim and cover you under warranty. Also makes sense.
...What bugs me is when a company doesn't stand by their marketing with their warranty. ...
You keep repeating this with regards to ZT. Do you have any examples or are you just making this up? Provide an actual example/proof or stop this nonsense.
Every time i read one of your posts i can feel myself getting dumber... seriously, why such a hard on for advertising language? Every company in America uses verbiage that they feel best portrays what they are trying to sell. If they are in compliance with advertising regulations then the only real issue is your disagreement with their implications. Every time Mcdonalds says "im lovin it" i disagree, but im not up in arms on some fast food website playing keyboard commando. Besides the fact you dont like their slogan WTF is your issue? Wanna pry with your knife, go for it, just dont expect the warranty to cover your lack of common sense. Dont like their slogan, dont buy it. Want to voice your opinion, you have....why keep pushing non-sensical arguments?
For what its worth, here is a "hard use" test, while definitley misuse and abuse, it shows what a ZT can do. The reason you dont see this as a sponsored video is because they dont want a bunch of morons misusing their products and blaming KAI for their own stupidity.
[video=youtube;AW0TVkcBFkw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AW0TVkcBFkw[/video]
Not to mention, as MQQN has stated several times:
The actual knife in question did not fail due to prying but simply due to a loose lock insert. Once it was tightened, the knife functioned fine.
At 11:18 into the video, the guy is stabbing the wood then "prying" it ...yes this is a hard use video and he is using the knife to pick and pry. Why shouldnt a knife of this heft be able to pry like he is in the video?