Patryn and Keith M make a good point. There's plenty of precedent for a villain being the one to clean up an industry. Joseph Kennedy springs immediately to mind. As that example indicates, you don't have to like or respect the person either. There's considerable hypocrisy in that, certainly, but that's the way things can occur - imperfect.
No-one with any sense could reach a properly concluded view on the basis of what has been presented here. Mr Turber shows every sign of being very confident. If that is justified then good luck to him. At law, there are non-copyright based causes of action a party could resort to in a situation like this, incidentally.
Reading this has made me stop and think how many letters like those presented here I must have seen over 20 plus years. I really don't know, but my guess would be 10,000 plus by now, maybe many more. Quite honestly, I am not meaning to be disparaging. Nor to grandstand by posting here, even. I will say though: neither one of them impresses me a great deal - each could be used to the disadvantage of the interests of the party on whose behalf they were prepared. I expect a judge would view them in much the same way also, if this ever reaches a courtroom.
Mr Turber it can and does happen that a person can succeed with a legal matter without legal representation. But, this is infrequent and is rather perilous, to say the least. I have no idea what Mr Jones is alluding to in a post above. He has however said something in an earlier one I do agree with, without any qualification:
If you are determined to proceed with this, get a lawyer. And make sure it's a good one.