Another Harness Jack arrived, nothing to jump up and join a mile long queue to view though.
Interesting one, Remington, but as you can see its a straight line stamp- and immediately you can see aesthetically it doesn't hold a match to a "real" Remington.
These were contracted out to other manufacturers- and I can see Camillus shining bright from this one, I could be wrong on this
I am not too sure why Remington would use their name on a more economical product when they made such outstanding beautiful knives like Charlie's Remington Harness Jack knife he shared with us not so long ago, and I don't have one like Charlies to be able to put alongside of this one to show the outstanding differences.
To me though, these Blue Collar examples are still an important piece in the puzzle that can never be finished, I value them, not only do they add to and have a place in a collection, they add a little to experience and knowledge I guess. (Time for my sleep

)
The Punch though, still resembles the Remington's, if you go back to the top of previous page Charlie shows his Remington's Punch the way they finished them, most times to this day a real Remington punch will still have an anodized finished, a nice curved face and Pile side, they finished their nicest knives punches in a couple of ways where one has a nicely finessed curve where the machining stops at the Tang, and then they at times did not finish with that nice finish touch of that curve and machine simply ran off, but we see this on a lot of other Punches as well.
This punch on this fellow here has the basic shape of the Remington, and if it was Camillus who made this they certainly did not use their Spiral or their non-Spiral. Depending on manufacture age of this knife, Camillus's Spiral came out in '38 so did Remington give the firm this punch to use? always questions pop up in the Punch world.
View attachment 3190337View attachment 3190338View attachment 3190339View attachment 3190340View attachment 3190341