Leslie Tomville
Gold Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2016
- Messages
- 2,355
View attachment 2601399View attachment 2601400
This has to be one of Charlie’s finest. Thank you
waynorth
!
This has to be one of Charlie’s finest. Thank you
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
Would that be LLBHJ for short John?The new GEC #78 Barlow reminds me of a slightly shorter Daddy Barlow, or a longer Barlow.
The Daddy Barlows don't follow the1/3 bolster rule either, yet they are still considered Barlows... are they not?
Maybe Daddy Barlows are supposed to be called "Large Long Bolster Barehead Jacks"???
Those are just proper.
A gracious tribute!!! Thank You!!!
The single Blade!!View attachment 2601830
(all scratches and marks on my decrepit scanner, not the knives!!)
I think it will start catching on.Would that be LLBHJ for short John?
Wow both of those are just stunners! Love the red and black on the right, some serious character there!
Those are not mine, but they are wild variations of Cocobola!!Wow both of those are just stunners! Love the red and black on the right, some serious character there!
Only if you choose to limit yourself, Levine doesn't nor do the cutlers. Thankfully.
Both of these instances are true. However, this instance is not one of those. It is a barlow. Levine even mentions that a sleeveboard barlow is rare. It would stand to reason that most people are unfamiliar with these examples. Just because one has not been exposed to something does not make it not real.Just because a Cutler names it a Barlow doesn't necessarily make it a Barlow. A few Cutlers have called their knives "Lambsfoot" for instance when they clearly are not. Maher and Groshe's #35 "The Trapper" also comes to mind. Sometimes a name is just a name![]()